Lol, I thought video would have sold it!RossDagley wrote:In other news mike - I've been chatting to dean. Decided against your old tubi after seeing the rolling road day video... Brutal. :/
Carbon intake Vs standard airbox power.
Re: Carbon intake Vs standard airbox power.
- RossDagley
- Top Gear
- Posts: 2334
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 11:53 pm
- Location: Bedford, UK
Re: Carbon intake Vs standard airbox power.
There's no way the car is usable on any track, anywhere in the UK with that noise level lol. Not to mention the wife would disown me. (swings and roundabouts I guess). 

Believe only the man who has nothing to gain from what he says.
2017 BMW M4 Competition Pack - Mineral Grey - 530ps by bootmod3, JCWeldfab exhaust.
Previously:
Renault Megane R26 - Liquid Yellow - 275ps.
2015 Audi Exclusive RS4 B8 - Merlin Purple - JCWF Exhaust
2009 Audi RS6 C6 - Phantom Black - 730ps MRC Tuned
2008 Audi RS4 B7 - Phantom Black - 449ps MRC Tuned
2002 Peugeot 106 Gti - Mauritius blue - 430ps Home built.
2017 BMW M4 Competition Pack - Mineral Grey - 530ps by bootmod3, JCWeldfab exhaust.
Previously:
Renault Megane R26 - Liquid Yellow - 275ps.
2015 Audi Exclusive RS4 B8 - Merlin Purple - JCWF Exhaust
2009 Audi RS6 C6 - Phantom Black - 730ps MRC Tuned
2008 Audi RS4 B7 - Phantom Black - 449ps MRC Tuned
2002 Peugeot 106 Gti - Mauritius blue - 430ps Home built.
- geordie jay
- 5th Gear
- Posts: 1114
- Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2014 7:35 pm
Re: Carbon intake Vs standard airbox power.
well you know what to do ross if you get sick of your lassRossDagley wrote:There's no way the car is usable on any track, anywhere in the UK with that noise level lol. Not to mention the wife would disown me. (swings and roundabouts I guess).


- Bladerider
- 4th Gear
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 3:49 pm
- Location: Speedfreak County !!
- Contact:
Re: Carbon intake Vs standard airbox power.
Gotta laugh at people thinking they actually gonna notice a 6bhp loss on a 440bhp, almost 2ton car
Human dyno is obviously the most accurate device on the planet lmfao
Even funnier is "ram-air"
I love rs246
Human dyno is obviously the most accurate device on the planet lmfao
Even funnier is "ram-air"


I love rs246
07 RS4 Avus Avant : Usual spec with Buckets+FBSW+iPod dock+TV etc...100k+
Thanks to GBH Motorsport MRC Tuning VirdeeAuto Dubstep AwesomeGTI Wallachie Trups
H&R - Coilovers ARBs Spacers : 034 - RearArms Droplinks BilletMounts StrutTops : Eibach FrontArms : Powerflex Bushes
MRC - Stage2 Map+codeouts Stage2 Inlet+7mm gasket Stage2 deCarbon CAF : BMC Filter : Milltek Decats NonRes
Anthracite Alloys : Advan Neovas : Ferodo Pads+Castrol SRF : HEL Brakelines : Trups LED lighting
Thanks to GBH Motorsport MRC Tuning VirdeeAuto Dubstep AwesomeGTI Wallachie Trups
H&R - Coilovers ARBs Spacers : 034 - RearArms Droplinks BilletMounts StrutTops : Eibach FrontArms : Powerflex Bushes
MRC - Stage2 Map+codeouts Stage2 Inlet+7mm gasket Stage2 deCarbon CAF : BMC Filter : Milltek Decats NonRes
Anthracite Alloys : Advan Neovas : Ferodo Pads+Castrol SRF : HEL Brakelines : Trups LED lighting
Re: Carbon intake Vs standard airbox power.
I'd have thought if you can get on the track with your non res decat milltek then the Tubi should be ok too; I don't imagine yours is quiet enough to use on any track with noise restrictions or can you pass some?RossDagley wrote:There's no way the car is usable on any track, anywhere in the UK with that noise level lol. Not to mention the wife would disown me. (swings and roundabouts I guess).
- TonyHayers
- 5th Gear
- Posts: 1175
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:03 am
- Location: Leeds
Re: Carbon intake Vs standard airbox power.
Most people with Revolution intake have CAF, which makes "heat soak" almost irrelevant.
06 Phantom Black Saloon:
DONE: Water Meth Injection, Carbon clean at 64k, CAI, Gutted Precats, Non-res x-pipe, H&R 8mm spacers, H&R springs
^ GONE
DONE: Water Meth Injection, Carbon clean at 64k, CAI, Gutted Precats, Non-res x-pipe, H&R 8mm spacers, H&R springs
^ GONE

- geordie jay
- 5th Gear
- Posts: 1114
- Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2014 7:35 pm
Re: Carbon intake Vs standard airbox power.
if that's true tony I have nothing to worry about..thanks for the info mateTonyHayers wrote:Most people with Revolution intake have CAF, which makes "heat soak" almost irrelevant.

- TonyHayers
- 5th Gear
- Posts: 1175
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:03 am
- Location: Leeds
Re: Carbon intake Vs standard airbox power.
Actually, let me clarify that 
Without CAF, the issue isn't really heat-soak IMV. It's just already hot air from the engine bay getting drawn straight into air filter, whereas with stock it's effectively sealed from engine bay.
With CAF, when moving, cooler air is directed straight at the filter so that less hot air is drawn from engine bay.
I'd say heat soak, is more why the inlet manifold gets hot - the ambient heat of engine bay + conducted heat from cylinder head.

Without CAF, the issue isn't really heat-soak IMV. It's just already hot air from the engine bay getting drawn straight into air filter, whereas with stock it's effectively sealed from engine bay.
With CAF, when moving, cooler air is directed straight at the filter so that less hot air is drawn from engine bay.
I'd say heat soak, is more why the inlet manifold gets hot - the ambient heat of engine bay + conducted heat from cylinder head.
06 Phantom Black Saloon:
DONE: Water Meth Injection, Carbon clean at 64k, CAI, Gutted Precats, Non-res x-pipe, H&R 8mm spacers, H&R springs
^ GONE
DONE: Water Meth Injection, Carbon clean at 64k, CAI, Gutted Precats, Non-res x-pipe, H&R 8mm spacers, H&R springs
^ GONE

Re: Carbon intake Vs standard airbox power.
To remedy this, somewhat anyway, get your manifolds zircotec coated

- RossDagley
- Top Gear
- Posts: 2334
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 11:53 pm
- Location: Bedford, UK
Re: Carbon intake Vs standard airbox power.
At the price to remove and refit the manifolds alone, then the £900+ for zircotec coatings, it'd be easier and (about £2k) cheaper to just refit the stock airbox with a CAF :pDeano_123 wrote:To remedy this, somewhat anyway, get your manifolds zircotec coated
Believe only the man who has nothing to gain from what he says.
2017 BMW M4 Competition Pack - Mineral Grey - 530ps by bootmod3, JCWeldfab exhaust.
Previously:
Renault Megane R26 - Liquid Yellow - 275ps.
2015 Audi Exclusive RS4 B8 - Merlin Purple - JCWF Exhaust
2009 Audi RS6 C6 - Phantom Black - 730ps MRC Tuned
2008 Audi RS4 B7 - Phantom Black - 449ps MRC Tuned
2002 Peugeot 106 Gti - Mauritius blue - 430ps Home built.
2017 BMW M4 Competition Pack - Mineral Grey - 530ps by bootmod3, JCWeldfab exhaust.
Previously:
Renault Megane R26 - Liquid Yellow - 275ps.
2015 Audi Exclusive RS4 B8 - Merlin Purple - JCWF Exhaust
2009 Audi RS6 C6 - Phantom Black - 730ps MRC Tuned
2008 Audi RS4 B7 - Phantom Black - 449ps MRC Tuned
2002 Peugeot 106 Gti - Mauritius blue - 430ps Home built.
Re: Carbon intake Vs standard airbox power.
For performance the stock box is by far the best and by adding a CAI you will enhance the current setup with the additional cold air and also the ram air effect.
The Carbon system add nothing but looks and sound, and although as a kid I loved that induction noise (and to be honest I would still love it now) but I see little point in spending all that money getting MRC to drag every little ounce of power out of our cars only to slap on a nice look and great sounding over priced induction kit and loose power, just don't get it
The Carbon system add nothing but looks and sound, and although as a kid I loved that induction noise (and to be honest I would still love it now) but I see little point in spending all that money getting MRC to drag every little ounce of power out of our cars only to slap on a nice look and great sounding over priced induction kit and loose power, just don't get it

Avus Audi RS4 2076|Black optic |Carbon Airbag surround|LED'S inside|RNS-E style Android Stereo with DAB+ dongle|
- geordie jay
- 5th Gear
- Posts: 1114
- Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2014 7:35 pm
Re: Carbon intake Vs standard airbox power.
the way I see it is if you planning on using the car for track days then fair enough,you gunna need as many horses as possible but for day to day usage I think loosing lets say 20bhp and having 400bhp left and a nice sound is enough for me to keep the pipecross.
Re: Carbon intake Vs standard airbox power.
There's a ram air effect available?!?!docurley wrote:...and also the ram air effect.
Popcorn time.
No matter where you go, there you are.
Re: Carbon intake Vs standard airbox power.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ram-air_intakeThe ram-air intake works by reducing the intake air velocity by increasing the cross-sectional area of the intake ducting. When gas velocity goes down the dynamic pressure is reduced, while the static pressure is increased. The increased static pressure in the plenum chamber has a positive effect on engine power, both because of the pressure itself and the increased air density that this higher pressure gives.
Avus Audi RS4 2076|Black optic |Carbon Airbag surround|LED'S inside|RNS-E style Android Stereo with DAB+ dongle|
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 68 guests