MTM 730 Disappointing Figures
-
- 3rd Gear
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 6:10 pm
Re: MTM 730 Disappointing Figures
FWIW, my RS6 has an APR stage 1 map, MTM ITG air filters and secondary muffler delete.
I ran it up on a Mainline AWD dyno with Shell V power which showed 584 bhp at the wheels and with 19% transmission loss 710 bhp at the engine.
Very close to claimed figures by APR. Maybe more at the engine if transmission power loss greater than 19%.
Runs 11.7 second quarters on V power. 11.4 secs on 104 octane.
cheers,
john
I ran it up on a Mainline AWD dyno with Shell V power which showed 584 bhp at the wheels and with 19% transmission loss 710 bhp at the engine.
Very close to claimed figures by APR. Maybe more at the engine if transmission power loss greater than 19%.
Runs 11.7 second quarters on V power. 11.4 secs on 104 octane.
cheers,
john
- Attachments
-
- 2009 AUDI C6 RS6 AWD Mainline dyno run 584 bhp_Bill Lee_4 October 2014.pdf
- (1.59 MiB) Downloaded 104 times
2009 RS6 sedan,5.0L FSI V10,phantom black,730bhp-98 octane,750bhp-104 octane,APR stage 1 map,MTM/Performance Friction 405mm front rotors,JCFabweld sports exhaust,MRC filters,Michelin PSS.
2011 Lamborghini Gallardo LP560-4 coupe,5.2L V10 TT UGR 800-1250whp, e-gear 6 speed,390 mm Alcon Racing front rotors, grey.
1969 E type Jaguar convertible with 5.2L 6 cylinder Rob Beere Racing engine,356 bhp-415 ft-lbs,midnight blue-old school but beautiful
2011 Lamborghini Gallardo LP560-4 coupe,5.2L V10 TT UGR 800-1250whp, e-gear 6 speed,390 mm Alcon Racing front rotors, grey.
1969 E type Jaguar convertible with 5.2L 6 cylinder Rob Beere Racing engine,356 bhp-415 ft-lbs,midnight blue-old school but beautiful
Re: MTM 730 Disappointing Figures
800nm is weak.
pressure test for leaks and check codes and adaption levels
it was on good fuel?
pressure test for leaks and check codes and adaption levels
it was on good fuel?
S2 Coupe : S4 B5 WB : RS6 C5 : S4 B8 : R8 V8 Turbo : Q7 4.2 TDI
http://www.MRCtuning.com
http://www.facebook.com/mrctuning
http://www.MRCtuning.com
http://www.facebook.com/mrctuning
Re: MTM 730 Disappointing Figures
Hi Doug,
Yes, it was running on Shell v-power. I'm suspecting it might be a combination of an iffy RR and a leak somewhere??
Kit
Yes, it was running on Shell v-power. I'm suspecting it might be a combination of an iffy RR and a leak somewhere??
Kit
Re: MTM 730 Disappointing Figures
Afternoon All,
Just to follow up on my thread from earlier in the month. Having taken the advice from many on the forum I've just returned from an early morning trip to MRC. Doug was able to work his magic and after a stage two (and gearbox) remap, the car has been transformed.
After an initial health check Doug was able to explain that the MTM remap was very high on initial boost and would then drop off hence the low figures. After a few runs on the dyno Doug managed to create a much more linear power delivery. I'm really pleased with the final result - 726Ps and 1054Nm.
Unfortunately the drive back was very wet and foggy, so no real chance to play properly. However from a couple of gentle runs the power delivery and pace are crazy........!
Doug - thank you for your hospitality this morning. I'm sure I'll be seeing you again! ; )
Kit
Just to follow up on my thread from earlier in the month. Having taken the advice from many on the forum I've just returned from an early morning trip to MRC. Doug was able to work his magic and after a stage two (and gearbox) remap, the car has been transformed.
After an initial health check Doug was able to explain that the MTM remap was very high on initial boost and would then drop off hence the low figures. After a few runs on the dyno Doug managed to create a much more linear power delivery. I'm really pleased with the final result - 726Ps and 1054Nm.
Unfortunately the drive back was very wet and foggy, so no real chance to play properly. However from a couple of gentle runs the power delivery and pace are crazy........!
Doug - thank you for your hospitality this morning. I'm sure I'll be seeing you again! ; )
Kit
Re: MTM 730 Disappointing Figures
im on the same MTM setup, need to book mine in at MRC shortly as well!
2020 Range rover Sport SVR Urban
2017 911 991.2 Turbo S
2007 Audi A3 2.0T Quattro
Gone:-C6 RS6 Saloon - Daytona Grey - ceramics, stage 2, gearbox map, quad tip miltek, pre cat delete and Mrc filters = 753ps + 1052NM
2017 911 991.2 Turbo S
2007 Audi A3 2.0T Quattro
Gone:-C6 RS6 Saloon - Daytona Grey - ceramics, stage 2, gearbox map, quad tip miltek, pre cat delete and Mrc filters = 753ps + 1052NM
Re: MTM 730 Disappointing Figures
Andy, best you sort out the exhaust and air filters before mapping it again.kent_andy wrote:im on the same MTM setup, need to book mine in at MRC shortly as well!
Too much power is barely enough.
Re: MTM 730 Disappointing Figures
Kit, glad you got yours sorted. Good numbers BTW.Kit13 wrote:Afternoon All,
Just to follow up on my thread from earlier in the month. Having taken the advice from many on the forum I've just returned from an early morning trip to MRC. Doug was able to work his magic and after a stage two (and gearbox) remap, the car has been transformed.
After an initial health check Doug was able to explain that the MTM remap was very high on initial boost and would then drop off hence the low figures. After a few runs on the dyno Doug managed to create a much more linear power delivery. I'm really pleased with the final result - 726Ps and 1054Nm.
Unfortunately the drive back was very wet and foggy, so no real chance to play properly. However from a couple of gentle runs the power delivery and pace are crazy........!
Doug - thank you for your hospitality this morning. I'm sure I'll be seeing you again! ; )
Kit
Too much power is barely enough.
Re: MTM 730 Disappointing Figures
What did Doug say was the starting figures? Did they match up with the previous numbers you had?
Re: MTM 730 Disappointing Figures
Check this out... 656... it's a far cry from the MTM quoted numbers.MikeFish wrote:What did Doug say was the starting figures? Did they match up with the previous numbers you had?
https://www.facebook.com/mrctuning
Too much power is barely enough.
Re: MTM 730 Disappointing Figures
@ kent_andy - Do it. If your MTM setup is anywhere similar to mine you'll notice a huge difference with the MRC map.
@ Classba - Thanks for the comments and your advice, its much appreciated.
@ MikeFish - The MTM figures were nowhere near the quoted 730 figure. I can't see how they sell a 730 package that comes in so much lower in reality?!
As I mentioned I'm very pleased with the MRC end result. Now when's this torrential rain going to clear up so I can go out and have proper run?!
Thanks again for the excellent forum advice.
K
@ Classba - Thanks for the comments and your advice, its much appreciated.
@ MikeFish - The MTM figures were nowhere near the quoted 730 figure. I can't see how they sell a 730 package that comes in so much lower in reality?!
As I mentioned I'm very pleased with the MRC end result. Now when's this torrential rain going to clear up so I can go out and have proper run?!
Thanks again for the excellent forum advice.
K
Re: MTM 730 Disappointing Figures
Nice one great figures now
glad you got it sorted

Re: MTM 730 Disappointing Figures
While I was looking at their page I had a little rewind to see my car on their rollers... brutal!! Must try and post a link on my build thread.classba wrote:Check this out... 656... it's a far cry from the MTM quoted numbers.MikeFish wrote:What did Doug say was the starting figures? Did they match up with the previous numbers you had?
https://www.facebook.com/mrctuning
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 78 guests