MRC Vs STOCK???

4.2 V8 32v Naturally Aspirated - 414 bhp
P_G
Cruising
Posts: 8249
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 1:25 pm
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne

Re: MRC Vs STOCK???

Post by P_G » Tue May 31, 2011 9:39 pm

RSKiwi wrote:
neckarsulm wrote:How come the MRC dyno readings are at relatively low revs?
The power ones are at much higher revs, I should have added the rpm for peak power

351PS @ 6080rpm
377PS @ 7217rpm
391PS @ 7806rpm
Apart from the last run they are very low peak power rpms, understandable if they were wheel rpm but engine rpm should be 7800-8200rpm so what's going on there then? This is peak power area on both three different Dyno Dynamics Roads and Dastek raods I have used. The forst one I gather from vacuum leak and air box flap not working but the 2nd and 3rd peak bhp should be higher up the rev range?

RS6chris!
Cruising
Posts: 3845
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 8:55 pm
Location: North East(Teesside).

Re: MRC Vs STOCK???

Post by RS6chris! » Tue May 31, 2011 9:43 pm

aka_dk wrote:£650 for 14PS and 18NM

think I'd rather spend it on beer


Which takes me back to one of my original questions......side by side stock versus a remapped car...which is quicker??? Are we talking 3 4 5 car lengths faster or half a car length or no difference at all????

Someone must have had a drag race....
Panamera Turbo S e hybrid (again)
RS6 C8 carbon black(merlin)
Panamera Turbo S e hybrid
RS6 C8 launch edition
R8 V10 plus
C7 RS6 PE dynamic pack plus
C7 RS6
Porsche Panamera Turbo
C6 RS6 AVANT
RS4 B7
Golf R32 mk 5
BMW M3 E46
Golf R32 mk 5
Golf GTI mk 5
VW Passat 130d 4 motion
VW bora 150pd
Ford Mondeo Ghia X V6
Ford Focus zetec
Rover 214!!

User avatar
RSKiwi
5th Gear
Posts: 1109
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 6:43 pm

Re: MRC Vs STOCK???

Post by RSKiwi » Tue May 31, 2011 9:45 pm

P_G wrote:
RSKiwi wrote:
neckarsulm wrote:How come the MRC dyno readings are at relatively low revs?
The power ones are at much higher revs, I should have added the rpm for peak power

351PS @ 6080rpm
377PS @ 7217rpm
391PS @ 7806rpm
Apart from the last run they are very low peak power rpms, understandable if they were wheel rpm but engine rpm should be 7800-8200rpm so what's going on there then? This is peak power area on both three different Dyno Dynamics Roads and Dastek raods I have used. The forst one I gather from vacuum leak and air box flap not working but the 2nd and 3rd peak bhp should be higher up the rev range?
True but these runs are with the GruppeM intake fitted and nothing having been cleaned, Doug actually said that with the clean and port the peak power would be climbing up the rev range, until I have this done it is definitely being held back.
____________________
C5 RS6 Avant

Gone
MRC'd B7 RS4
B6 3.0 A4
C5 A6
Pug 405 NZ Touring Car
Jeep Cherokee (we all have things we are ashamed of)
Toyota Landcruiser
1963 Beige rat look VW Beetle 1.3 no performance engine

P_G
Cruising
Posts: 8249
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 1:25 pm
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne

Re: MRC Vs STOCK???

Post by P_G » Tue May 31, 2011 9:46 pm

unless a rolling start the bhp difference you are talking about could be negated by the standing start so it is always subjective to your bum dyno.

User avatar
Steve_C
Top Gear
Posts: 2095
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 10:07 pm
Location: Pork pies and stilton
Contact:

Re: MRC Vs STOCK???

Post by Steve_C » Tue May 31, 2011 9:47 pm

My last dyno run showed peak power of 434PS @ 7402 rpm and previous runs showed peak power in the range 7100 to 7800. Would be surprised if peak power is above 8000?
Gone to the dark side

P_G
Cruising
Posts: 8249
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 1:25 pm
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne

Re: MRC Vs STOCK???

Post by P_G » Tue May 31, 2011 9:49 pm

RSKiwi wrote:
P_G wrote:
RSKiwi wrote:The power ones are at much higher revs, I should have added the rpm for peak power

351PS @ 6080rpm
377PS @ 7217rpm
391PS @ 7806rpm
Apart from the last run they are very low peak power rpms, understandable if they were wheel rpm but engine rpm should be 7800-8200rpm so what's going on there then? This is peak power area on both three different Dyno Dynamics Roads and Dastek raods I have used. The forst one I gather from vacuum leak and air box flap not working but the 2nd and 3rd peak bhp should be higher up the rev range?
True but these runs are with the GruppeM intake fitted and nothing having been cleaned, Doug actually said that with the clean and port the peak power would be climbing up the rev range, until I have this done it is definitely being held back.
So that implies your GruppeM is holding your car back? How has your car been driven in the past by you or previous owners RSKiwi?

User avatar
RSKiwi
5th Gear
Posts: 1109
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 6:43 pm

Re: MRC Vs STOCK???

Post by RSKiwi » Tue May 31, 2011 9:50 pm

Steve_C wrote:My last dyno run showed peak power of 434PS @ 7402 rpm and previous runs showed peak power in the range 7100 to 7800. Would be surprised if peak power is above 8000?
Only one way to find out now!
____________________
C5 RS6 Avant

Gone
MRC'd B7 RS4
B6 3.0 A4
C5 A6
Pug 405 NZ Touring Car
Jeep Cherokee (we all have things we are ashamed of)
Toyota Landcruiser
1963 Beige rat look VW Beetle 1.3 no performance engine

P_G
Cruising
Posts: 8249
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 1:25 pm
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne

Re: MRC Vs STOCK???

Post by P_G » Tue May 31, 2011 9:50 pm

Steve_C wrote:My last dyno run showed peak power of 434PS @ 7402 rpm and previous runs showed peak power in the range 7100 to 7800. Would be surprised if peak power is above 8000?
Can't find my other graph at present but

BHP 396.5@7984 rpm (2009) vs. 394.2@ 7702rpm (2010)
Torque 312.0 @3594rpm (2009) vs. 319.2 @ 3565rpm (2010)

Image

Image

Image

So to correct my last statement from 7500rpm onward?
Last edited by P_G on Tue May 31, 2011 10:04 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Steve_C
Top Gear
Posts: 2095
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 10:07 pm
Location: Pork pies and stilton
Contact:

Re: MRC Vs STOCK???

Post by Steve_C » Tue May 31, 2011 9:52 pm

RSKiwi wrote:Doug actually said that with the clean and port the peak power would be climbing up the rev range, until I have this done it is definitely being held back.
Interesting, when MRC cleaned/ported my engine peak power arrived sooner (7400 vs 7800).
Gone to the dark side

User avatar
RSKiwi
5th Gear
Posts: 1109
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 6:43 pm

Re: MRC Vs STOCK???

Post by RSKiwi » Tue May 31, 2011 10:00 pm

P_G wrote:
So that implies your GruppeM is holding your car back? How has your car been driven in the past by you or previous owners RSKiwi?
Not at all, I mentioned it because I didnt have the standard airbox so the flap not operating wasnt an issue here. I actually asked the question of Doug whether I should ditch it in favour of a standard box with a panel filter and he didnt think I should. The ultimate power output will be a sum of all the parts such as the filter, a map, the port and clean etc. Only when this has all been done can we reasonably compare it to other vehicles that have had work done at MRC. Its too early to say the GruppeM is holding it back.
____________________
C5 RS6 Avant

Gone
MRC'd B7 RS4
B6 3.0 A4
C5 A6
Pug 405 NZ Touring Car
Jeep Cherokee (we all have things we are ashamed of)
Toyota Landcruiser
1963 Beige rat look VW Beetle 1.3 no performance engine

User avatar
RSKiwi
5th Gear
Posts: 1109
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 6:43 pm

Re: MRC Vs STOCK???

Post by RSKiwi » Tue May 31, 2011 10:05 pm

Steve_C wrote:
RSKiwi wrote:Doug actually said that with the clean and port the peak power would be climbing up the rev range, until I have this done it is definitely being held back.
Interesting, when MRC cleaned/ported my engine peak power arrived sooner (7400 vs 7800).
You make a good point, we will find out what mine does in a few months.
____________________
C5 RS6 Avant

Gone
MRC'd B7 RS4
B6 3.0 A4
C5 A6
Pug 405 NZ Touring Car
Jeep Cherokee (we all have things we are ashamed of)
Toyota Landcruiser
1963 Beige rat look VW Beetle 1.3 no performance engine

User avatar
Steve_C
Top Gear
Posts: 2095
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 10:07 pm
Location: Pork pies and stilton
Contact:

Re: MRC Vs STOCK???

Post by Steve_C » Tue May 31, 2011 10:07 pm

RSKiwi wrote:
Steve_C wrote:
RSKiwi wrote:Doug actually said that with the clean and port the peak power would be climbing up the rev range, until I have this done it is definitely being held back.
Interesting, when MRC cleaned/ported my engine peak power arrived sooner (7400 vs 7800).
You make a good point, we will find out what mine does in a few months.
Looking forward to it! Mine was also remapped at the time, so not sure if this would've influenced my result.
Gone to the dark side

User avatar
Stoffle32
3rd Gear
Posts: 283
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 2:26 pm
Location: South Africa

Re: MRC Vs STOCK???

Post by Stoffle32 » Wed Jun 01, 2011 8:42 am

do you know where about the air leak was?
You had the Gruppe intake before you went to MRC right?

Reason im asking think I might have an air leak as well my peak power at the moment is also pretty low at 6500rpm then kinda just remains the same....
I made 359bhp and 452nm however this was on 95 unleaded and airbox flap is stuck open...

User avatar
Steve_C
Top Gear
Posts: 2095
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 10:07 pm
Location: Pork pies and stilton
Contact:

Re: MRC Vs STOCK???

Post by Steve_C » Wed Jun 01, 2011 8:45 am

My first run (358PS) was with a stuck airbox flap - result was a loss of about 10PS. 95 ron will also lose you some power I'd have thought.
Gone to the dark side

User avatar
RSKiwi
5th Gear
Posts: 1109
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 6:43 pm

Re: MRC Vs STOCK???

Post by RSKiwi » Wed Jun 01, 2011 9:25 am

Stoffle32 wrote:do you know where about the air leak was?
You had the Gruppe intake before you went to MRC right?

Reason im asking think I might have an air leak as well my peak power at the moment is also pretty low at 6500rpm then kinda just remains the same....
I made 359bhp and 452nm however this was on 95 unleaded and airbox flap is stuck open...
This is where it gets hazy, the vacuum pipe that led to the air flap solenoid was plugged but apparently there is another connection/or part of this vacuum setup which may have been leaking, MRC plugged this and the leak was fixed. I fitted the GruppeM and I cant figure out where else it could have been leaking from and I forgot to get Doug to show me. Perhaps someone else on here might have a better idea of what was done with removing the airbox and vacuum pipe plugging?
____________________
C5 RS6 Avant

Gone
MRC'd B7 RS4
B6 3.0 A4
C5 A6
Pug 405 NZ Touring Car
Jeep Cherokee (we all have things we are ashamed of)
Toyota Landcruiser
1963 Beige rat look VW Beetle 1.3 no performance engine

Post Reply

Return to “RS4 (B7 Typ 8E) 2006–2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 109 guests