Audi's official answer to carbon build up

4.2 V8 32v Naturally Aspirated - 414 bhp
wolfgang
4th Gear
Posts: 530
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:26 pm

Post by wolfgang » Wed Jan 26, 2011 10:23 pm

An engine oil change must be performed following the use of cleaning agents!
That bit is interesting. Why would an oil change be required? Is it because the stuff that comes off contaminates the oil?

Would using something like Wynns Formula Gold Petrol Treatment as a fuel additive make any difference.
2007 RS4 Avant in Mugello Blue + Milltek non-res valved, MRC air filter, MRC remap with silent-mode startup

adsgreen
Cruising
Posts: 5571
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:54 am

Post by adsgreen » Wed Jan 26, 2011 10:52 pm

Pretty standard to change the oil after a flush.
The clear out gets taken away by the oil as well as some out the exhaust manifold.
Iirc it makes the oil very black and really smelly.

I hear what people saying but the article reads pretty generic to me. It's also counter to what Audi do iirc with blasting it with nut shells(?) . I don't think the residue on fsi engines is actually carbon (on the conventional sense). Proper coking is brittle and dry where the description of this issue is more a sticky sludge. Don't get mr wrong - there's carbon in there but theres more to it. if it were as simple as adding a small additive to the fuel once a year then it'd be a non issue. (and that's not factoring in if it's a problem to begin with)

User avatar
wellzieRS4
4th Gear
Posts: 587
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 6:51 pm

Post by wellzieRS4 » Wed Jan 26, 2011 10:59 pm

Whos going first then?

wrekka
5th Gear
Posts: 1480
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 3:58 pm

Post by wrekka » Wed Jan 26, 2011 11:07 pm

wellzieRS4 wrote:Whos going first then?
what do the specialist think, like MRC etc of this?

Rick_RS4
Cruising
Posts: 2882
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 4:37 pm

Post by Rick_RS4 » Wed Jan 26, 2011 11:19 pm

wrekka wrote:
wellzieRS4 wrote:Whos going first then?
what do the specialist think, like MRC etc of this?
most probably dont do it, as it will be cheaper than a manifold off clean,

however by the looks of the carbon build up pics it looks very stuck on and doubtful that any additive will remove it,

adding anything to the fuel wont do anything as the injectors inject below the valves not onto them.

5litres of mr muscle down the inlet should do the trick lol

lengster1
Cruising
Posts: 3052
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 3:00 pm

Post by lengster1 » Wed Jan 26, 2011 11:31 pm

Its not clear how it works is it? are they saying the detergant is introduced to a running engine for 30 mins via the inlet tract somehow (presumably some sort of spray canister) effectively washing it all into the combustion chamber and back out through exhaust valve??? You want to wash all that carbon into your bores???? ive got it wrong or there having a laugh but cant see how else it would contaminate your oil and require a change after this procedure? If i got the right end of the stick then i wouldnt touch this method with a barge pole unless the did a before and after compression test and boroscope inspection of the bores

adsgreen
Cruising
Posts: 5571
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:54 am

Post by adsgreen » Wed Jan 26, 2011 11:47 pm

Seems pretty clear to me - the article states it's introduced using a temporary replacement fuel system which is why it also states (bar one) not to put it in the fuel tank.

I've flushed through other engines using similar products and it trashes the oil. It really smells bad when you drain it.

I agree you wouldn't want some of the chucks I've seen just falling off into a running engine. It's why mrc and others work on the cylinders with closed valves. These kinds of products are designed for relatively small amounts of coke.

adsgreen
Cruising
Posts: 5571
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:54 am

Post by adsgreen » Thu Jan 27, 2011 12:00 am

Interesting article from wynns themselves on direct injection.
http://www.wynns.net/product_files/dire ... 023079.pdf

User avatar
ArthurPE
Cruising
Posts: 3755
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 3:15 am
Location: USA

Post by ArthurPE » Thu Jan 27, 2011 12:11 am

I'd like to see the manual...how the system hooked up...if it's to the fuel rail, won't help the inlet valves...as someone said...will do the cylinder, piston, etc.

I am working on something to do this, there will be millions of cars, and mucho $$$ to be made...
I personally don't think deposits are an issue, but if people are willing to pay for 'scotchguard', permanent paint sealant and tranny flushes, why not make a few bucks?

it is non-corrosive, biodegradable, non-chemical/toxic and abundant
hook the system up, and drive around on the highway for an hour (or so)
should make it spotless....it will dissolve it slowly and in very small pieces, no chunks...may need 2 treatments for extreme cases
should not require an oil change afterwards

User avatar
Ice_Coffee
4th Gear
Posts: 808
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 10:55 am

Post by Ice_Coffee » Thu Jan 27, 2011 12:19 am

adsgreen wrote:Interesting article from wynns themselves on direct injection.
http://www.wynns.net/product_files/dire ... 023079.pdf
Very interesting indeed

lengster1
Cruising
Posts: 3052
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 3:00 pm

Post by lengster1 » Thu Jan 27, 2011 9:47 am

The only way it will work is to introduce via the inlet track,introducing it via std injectors into the combustion chamber AFTER the carbon build up isnt going to do anything hence i presumed via a pressurized vessel it would be introduced to the intake system BEFORE the carbon build up to have any effect

adsgreen
Cruising
Posts: 5571
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:54 am

Post by adsgreen » Thu Jan 27, 2011 11:05 am

lengster1 wrote:The only way it will work is to introduce via the inlet track,introducing it via std injectors into the combustion chamber AFTER the carbon build up isnt going to do anything hence i presumed via a pressurized vessel it would be introduced to the intake system BEFORE the carbon build up to have any effect
I'm presuming that it's been written without FSI in mind. Knowing how these documents turn up, it's probably a modification to an older document thats been sitting on someones desk for a while. Not saying it's not accurate or the tests were not valid just that it's a normal petrol engine process. None of the products specifically mentioned are designed for aerosol use and all are fuel additives.

SR71
5th Gear
Posts: 1376
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:58 am

Post by SR71 » Thu Jan 27, 2011 12:37 pm

it is non-corrosive, biodegradable, non-chemical/toxic and abundant
hook the system up, and drive around on the highway for an hour (or so)
should make it spotless....it will dissolve it slowly and in very small pieces, no chunks...may need 2 treatments for extreme cases
should not require an oil change afterwards
Art,

Are you saying the above is what your invention will do/how it will work?

Somehow, for FSI cars, it needs to be introduced pre-valves doesn't it for maximum utility? Or are you operating on the principle that if the deposition can occur as is, any cleaning agent should be able to clean via the same mechanism which allows the deposition in the first place?
58 C6 RS6 Stage 2+
58 C6 A6 Allroad 2.7 TDi

Previous:

2000 B5 S4 MRC 550 Saloon
2007 B7 RS4 Saloon
1994 S2 Coupe

User avatar
Timster
Cruising
Posts: 2821
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:55 pm
Location: Herts

Post by Timster » Thu Jan 27, 2011 1:25 pm

ArthurPE wrote:I'd like to see the manual...how the system hooked up...if it's to the fuel rail, won't help the inlet valves...as someone said...will do the cylinder, piston, etc.

I am working on something to do this, there will be millions of cars, and mucho $$$ to be made...
I personally don't think deposits are an issue, but if people are willing to pay for 'scotchguard', permanent paint sealant and tranny flushes, why not make a few bucks?

it is non-corrosive, biodegradable, non-chemical/toxic and abundant
hook the system up, and drive around on the highway for an hour (or so)
should make it spotless....it will dissolve it slowly and in very small pieces, no chunks...may need 2 treatments for extreme cases
should not require an oil change afterwards
Hi Arthur... I thought you were working on something.
When can we get some and test it for you?

User avatar
ArthurPE
Cruising
Posts: 3755
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 3:15 am
Location: USA

Post by ArthurPE » Thu Jan 27, 2011 4:41 pm

yep, introduced into the air filter housing or afm duct
SR71 wrote: Art,

Are you saying the above is what your invention will do/how it will work?

Somehow, for FSI cars, it needs to be introduced pre-valves doesn't it for maximum utility? Or are you operating on the principle that if the deposition can occur as is, any cleaning agent should be able to clean via the same mechanism which allows the deposition in the first place?

Post Reply

Return to “RS4 (B7 Typ 8E) 2006–2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 142 guests