Another Angle on Torque Converter 17125 Code

4.2 V8 40v biturbo - 450 bhp
4.2 V8 40v biturbo - 480 bhp (plus)
Q_Cars
Neutral
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 4:30 am

Another Angle on Torque Converter 17125 Code

Post by Q_Cars » Tue Jun 01, 2010 8:19 am

Gidday up there in Pomgolia!

I posted this over on RS6.com, sorry for the long post, but hope it might generate some ideas...

The RS6 threw the dreaded 17125 code a few weeks back, although it is intermittent. I was (am) mentally preparing myself for jumping onto the the "new torque converter, new transmission" train. Before going there however I thought I'd do some logging, along the lines of what shoppint reported in http://www.rs6.com/showthread.php/19...l=1#post176023.

In the above link & thread, Tozo noted that the 'Torque Conv Clutch' column is the status of the command to the TC, not the status of the TC itself. I will further speculate that the TCC Solenoid N218 reading is the current drawn by the solenoid as it operates the valve that locks/regulates/opens the clutch. When TC is open, current is low @ 0.048A, when TC is regulating, current varies between 0.4-0.5A, when TC is closed, current is 0.744A

So, some example logs (cleared the 17125 code first!): In general driving, using low/moderate throttle openings, the TC behaved perfectly, opening, regulating, and locking up as expected (ie engine rpm = input rpm). Here's an example log:

Image[/img]

I drove around happily for 30 mins or so in a mix of round town and motorway driving and normal service continued. I checked the error codes, and all clear. Then I got to a nice empty uphill on-ramp to the motorway and gave it full throttle with a kick down, then eased off:
Image

Without posting all of the log, what happened next was that the TC did its normal thing for 20 seconds more, including locking up, and then when I came to a section of road (gentle uphill to flat) where the TC is normally locked at around 100 kph, the TC command status changed to TC OPEN and stayed that way e.g. Image

You can now see how engine RPM is higher than input RPM and the TC Stall column measures the rev difference (or TC slip speed).

I tried combinations of speeding up, slowing down, even used the paddles to change down/up etc but it stayed open. I then pulled over, and checked the error codes and sure enough 17125 had reappeared. I turned off the engine, let it sit for a minute or so, restarted and drove off. TC back to normal behaviour, opening, regulating and closing.

I managed to repeat this behaviour several times, 'forcing' the TC to apparently stick open by using hard acceleration, then stopping, switching off, and then TC operation went back to normal, locking up properly.

WTF?? It almost seems to me that something other than a failing TC clutch might be at play here. I would have expected if TC clutch was slipping, then the logging symptom would have been to have TC command to be TC CLOSED, while the engine rpm would exceed input rpm (so the solenoid was trying to operate the valve to close the clutch, but there was insufficient pressure to do so, and the clutch would slip etc).

It seems to me that what is going on here is that the command to close the clutch is not evening being registered, so the 'box is behaving like a good old fashioned slush-box without a lock-up clutch at all!!!

Is this a TCU issue instead?? It seems that the solenoid is not even getting the signal to close when it should (check the N218 current alongside the TC command status). Or is it actually the sign of a sticking valve (which I understand from the error code analysis is Pressure Regulating Valve 4), and might a valve body service/refurbish solve the problem??

Or am I waaaaayyy off beam here, and putting the wrong interpretation on all of this. If anyone else has any bright ideas, then I'm listening

User avatar
drybeer
Top Gear
Posts: 1564
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:52 pm
Location: Dumfries
Contact:

RE: Another Angle on Torque Converter 17125 Code

Post by drybeer » Tue Jun 01, 2010 8:42 am

I've been thinking that they valves might be the thing to have properly looked at by ZF in the way a BMW owner had done - there's a thread here somewhere on it.
______________________________________________________
C7 A6 allroad 3.0TDi.
Tiguan 2.0TDi R-line

User avatar
Shoppinit
Cruising
Posts: 20282
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:24 pm

RE: Another Angle on Torque Converter 17125 Code

Post by Shoppinit » Tue Jun 01, 2010 9:25 am

I think this is where it's useful to see graphical data. We need to see what the input / output rpms are doing when the signal for the TC to close is applied. I vaguely remember the thread you talk about, although I think your link is incorrect.

Rather than the TC not closing and that provoking the DTC 17125, I think what's happening is that your TC isn't closing in the allowed time, this is throwing the code and subsequently the TCU doesn't try to close the TC.

Perhaps there are other factors in play here, like the ATF temp. In fact, I just noticed that your ATF isn't up to temperature in your logs. On normal running the ATF should be the same temperature as the engine oil. Maybe what's happening is that you're pulling too hard while the ATF isn't up to spec temp and this is affecting it's ability to help the TC lock up. Takes longer than normal and the car throws the code, preventing the TCU from trying to close the TC.


Image
Daytona RS6 C5 Avant. Viper'd, Billies, Waggers, MTM box brain, C6 stoppers, xcarlink, R8 coolant cap (woohoo)
///M3 E46 | XC90 (V8, natch) | Passat GTE | RR Classic V8 flapper
"The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at and repair."

Q_Cars
Neutral
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 4:30 am

Re: RE: Another Angle on Torque Converter 17125 Code

Post by Q_Cars » Tue Jun 01, 2010 9:34 am

Shoppinit wrote:I think this is where it's useful to see graphical data. We need to see what the input / output rpms are doing when the signal for the TC to close is applied. I vaguely remember the thread you talk about, although I think your link is incorrect.

Rather than the TC not closing and that provoking the DTC 17125, I think what's happening is that your TC isn't closing in the allowed time, this is throwing the code and subsequently the TCU doesn't try to close the TC.

Perhaps there are other factors in play here, like the ATF temp. In fact, I just noticed that your ATF isn't up to temperature in your logs. On normal running the ATF should be the same temperature as the engine oil. Maybe what's happening is that you're pulling too hard while the ATF isn't up to spec temp and this is affecting it's ability to help the TC lock up. Takes longer than normal and the car throws the code, preventing the TCU from trying to close the TC.
Interesting comment re the ATF temp - I'd been driving around for over an hour and the max temp I saw was 73C. I'll look at some graphs and see what comes out there. Not sure what happened to the link - I think this is the right one: http://www.rs6.com/showthread.php/19793 ... post176023

User avatar
Shoppinit
Cruising
Posts: 20282
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:24 pm

RE: Re: RE: Another Angle on Torque Converter 17125 Code

Post by Shoppinit » Tue Jun 01, 2010 9:46 am

Yeah, that code definitely comes from the TCU not seeing the output rpms meet the input rpms when it thinks it should. ATF level or quality could be to blame. As could the N218 if it's weak. Like drybeer says, it might be worth having the valve body services by a ZF approved garage.

Of course it could also be a bad TC; but like House says let's ignore that one because we can't treat it!
Daytona RS6 C5 Avant. Viper'd, Billies, Waggers, MTM box brain, C6 stoppers, xcarlink, R8 coolant cap (woohoo)
///M3 E46 | XC90 (V8, natch) | Passat GTE | RR Classic V8 flapper
"The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at and repair."

User avatar
Shoppinit
Cruising
Posts: 20282
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:24 pm

RE: Re: RE: Another Angle on Torque Converter 17125 Code

Post by Shoppinit » Tue Jun 01, 2010 9:50 am

Daytona RS6 C5 Avant. Viper'd, Billies, Waggers, MTM box brain, C6 stoppers, xcarlink, R8 coolant cap (woohoo)
///M3 E46 | XC90 (V8, natch) | Passat GTE | RR Classic V8 flapper
"The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at and repair."

paul_23
3rd Gear
Posts: 287
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:10 am
Location: Dubai

RE: Re: RE: Another Angle on Torque Converter 17125 Code

Post by paul_23 » Tue Jun 01, 2010 10:00 am

Good thread and the characteristics you experience are EXACTLY what happened to me, and I did the same logging, the same clear DTC and same behaviour when booting it - great minds think alike! I also thought is this just a sleepy solenoid that the TCU gives up on and then stops sending the message to close..... I also cleared the DTC when driving and started to try to lock up again.

However, I took my car to a very experienced auto box specialist in Dubai. Consider that our ZF tranny is also in range rovers, X5s etc which are common as sh+te here and they don't need the engine removing to check the tranny like our barges do; so they strip down the ZFHP24 gearbox several times per week. Anyway, the manager had come across this problem many times and said the solenoid is not the fault, it is the seal within the TC that holds the pressure to close it. I did some searches and found a good post explaining this on a A6 forum (cant remember the link but google the fault code and it came up).

Anyway, I took his advice. Didn't touch the solenoid, took out the TC, got it upgraded by ACE and put it back in and hey presto, no fault codes!

As for the comment on the tranny temp, I did not find it matches the engine temp and really if you are not thrashing it it should be cooler. Perhaps the fact that you boot it, warms up the ATF and then it is more fluid so seeps through the seal within the TC.

Hope this is useful...but probably not good news if you have the fault code...

User avatar
Shoppinit
Cruising
Posts: 20282
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:24 pm

RE: Re: RE: Another Angle on Torque Converter 17125 Code

Post by Shoppinit » Tue Jun 01, 2010 10:03 am

Good post, Paul. I have just been reading about the oil seal that you mention. Seems the first production run wasn't very good and Audi uprated it since, although it's still not great.

How do you find the ACE converter now it's had time to bed in?
Daytona RS6 C5 Avant. Viper'd, Billies, Waggers, MTM box brain, C6 stoppers, xcarlink, R8 coolant cap (woohoo)
///M3 E46 | XC90 (V8, natch) | Passat GTE | RR Classic V8 flapper
"The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at and repair."

Q_Cars
Neutral
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 4:30 am

Re: RE: Re: RE: Another Angle on Torque Converter 17125 Code

Post by Q_Cars » Tue Jun 01, 2010 10:43 am

paul_23 wrote:Good thread and the characteristics you experience are EXACTLY what happened to me, and I did the same logging, the same clear DTC and same behaviour when booting it - great minds think alike! I also thought is this just a sleepy solenoid that the TCU gives up on and then stops sending the message to close..... I also cleared the DTC when driving and started to try to lock up again.

However, I took my car to a very experienced auto box specialist in Dubai. Consider that our ZF tranny is also in range rovers, X5s etc which are common as sh+te here and they don't need the engine removing to check the tranny like our barges do; so they strip down the ZFHP24 gearbox several times per week. Anyway, the manager had come across this problem many times and said the solenoid is not the fault, it is the seal within the TC that holds the pressure to close it. I did some searches and found a good post explaining this on a A6 forum (cant remember the link but google the fault code and it came up).

Anyway, I took his advice. Didn't touch the solenoid, took out the TC, got it upgraded by ACE and put it back in and hey presto, no fault codes!

As for the comment on the tranny temp, I did not find it matches the engine temp and really if you are not thrashing it it should be cooler. Perhaps the fact that you boot it, warms up the ATF and then it is more fluid so seeps through the seal within the TC.

Hope this is useful...but probably not good news if you have the fault code...
Thanks Paul, that's really helpful (although not good news :( ) One thing I was never sure about from other torque converter threads on this and other forums - to replace the TC in the C5 RS6, do you need to remove the engine to get at it for replacement?

User avatar
Shoppinit
Cruising
Posts: 20282
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:24 pm

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Another Angle on Torque Converter 17125

Post by Shoppinit » Tue Jun 01, 2010 10:51 am

I have heard rumours that the gearbox can be removed without removing the engine, but I've never seen it confirmed to my satisfaction.
Daytona RS6 C5 Avant. Viper'd, Billies, Waggers, MTM box brain, C6 stoppers, xcarlink, R8 coolant cap (woohoo)
///M3 E46 | XC90 (V8, natch) | Passat GTE | RR Classic V8 flapper
"The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at and repair."

jd_hants
4th Gear
Posts: 592
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 10:18 am
Location: Hampshire

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Another Angle on Torque Converter 17125

Post by jd_hants » Tue Jun 01, 2010 12:35 pm

Apparently, and I use the term 'apparently' as I have no hard/photographic evidence, my GB was removed to replace an oil seal without dropping the engine. As shoppinit says, I've not seen anyone confirm it can be done.

paul_23
3rd Gear
Posts: 287
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:10 am
Location: Dubai

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Another Angle on Torque Converter 17125

Post by paul_23 » Tue Jun 01, 2010 2:12 pm

My engine came out to do it.

The ACE converter is fine and has good manners. It is hard to compare whether it is better then the stock as no point of reference but it is claimed to be 10% more efficient than normal. The lock up clutch plates are carbon material rather then the stock paper stuff so it should last longer too.

Q_Cars
Neutral
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 4:30 am

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Another Angle on Torque Converter 17125

Post by Q_Cars » Fri Jul 09, 2010 11:06 pm

Update - and potentially good news :D I took the car into my service shop in Auckland for diagnosis. The car was also throwing 17537 (Fuel trim system too rich, bank 1 and bank 2). I was fully prepared for the bad news of a new TC required. Instead, they found the ATF level was too low by 2L. They topped it up, cleared the codes and took it our for some serious thrashing (since I was getting the code come up after hard acceleration). Result: No codes at all (including the fuel trim code) and TC is locking up just fine.

I took the car home last night, nice cool evening (2C), clear road, and it's very clear that my RS6 has found its mojo again. Engine feels much crisper (well it would if it's not running rich), TC locks up nice and quickly, and gear shifts are much crisper and less flare (I'd noticed a gradual increase in flare and minor clunks previously), and it absolutely flies again :beerchug:

The obvious question is where 2L of ATF went...2 service visits ago I had a seal on the transmission replaced to cure a leak. My suspicion is that when they did the work they didn't top up properly (or check level). Can't prove it of course, but it fits.

I'm wondering about the fuel trim code - perhaps when the TC clutch doesn't work properly, the mismatch of engine and input revs causes some sort of interaction between the ECU and TCU that throws the error??

Anyhow, I'll monitor the situation for the next few weeks and see how things go. All I know is that at the moment I've got that loving feeling back :biggrin3:

Cornishmoocher
Top Gear
Posts: 1957
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 10:55 pm
Location: FY/Kernow

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Another Angle on Torque Converter 17125

Post by Cornishmoocher » Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:36 am

Good thread and an interesting read.
Thanks for the info.

But Pomgolia!!?? Thats rich from one who hails from Asstrailia. ;) :lol:

P.S. the real question is, are your boys gonna get their poo together for the Ashes series? :beerchug:
It's all Bollox.
Half of what you read is bull and the other half is all <beep>.

paul_23
3rd Gear
Posts: 287
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:10 am
Location: Dubai

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Another Angle on Torque Converter 17125

Post by paul_23 » Sun Jul 11, 2010 9:22 am

Excellent news on the ATF - I forgot to post before that my ATF was about 1 litre down which was topped up but the fault codes kept coming back.

I had similar fuel trim fault codes after I had the MAFs replaced but the air box was not sat in the seals properly so unmetered air was leaking in and the o2 sensors noted something was wrong and trimmed the fuel to compensate. I had the box removed and replaced with new seals above and below the MAFs and all is well and no fault codes.
I never had the fuel trim fault codes when I had the TC problem.

Had your fuel trim faults appeared while the TC was faulty, recently etc or could they have been there for a while because duff fuel can also cause the problem - the ECU is always trimming but if it exceeds certain values then it records a fault.
If the fuel trim errors appear again you can do a few things to check and depends if the trim is for idle or throttle condition (VAGCOM explains the different blocks relating to each): check the MAF readings and Lambda readings for a run and you can see which scenario make the trim exceed the normal tolerance.

Post Reply

Return to “RS6 / RS6 plus (C5 Typ 4B) 2002-2004”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 139 guests