Post
by SR71 » Mon Mar 08, 2010 12:43 am
I'm sorry, but I'm inclined to agree with sims.
Audi should just step up to the plate and comment on the matter.
When a S2/RS2/8L S3/8P S3/B5 S4/B5 RS4/S5/D2 S8/V10 R8/TT/TTS/TTRS (amongst others) all make the claimed numbers on the dyno, if a B7 RS4 doesn't, it ain't because the dyno operator is prejudiced against B7 RS4 owners! So IMHO, the "can't trust a dyno" argument is a red-herring.
Mihnea probably has more experience with the Audi marque than anyone? And like he says, even if he does work for a tuning shop, why would he care if a B7 didn't make the numbers? He is just calling it the way he sees it surely?
I spend my life in an industry looking for the last fraction of a percent in performance. Its worth millions of dollars a year.
I do care about the last few percent, 1/10 in the 1/4, few degrees of ignition advance etc etc.
Thats why I bought a RS4 not a Trabant.
I actually have a letter from the CEO of Audi UK opening a case file on the matter and referring it to their Technical Department. Its probably still open? I was feeding back data on my oil samples to them as well but as I've got rid of the car, its a little hard for me to pursue any further and I'm not inclined to do so.
That said, I will steer away from DI cars until such time as I personally feel the paradigm has a degree of longevity in the performance sector.
The standard of debate 2 years ago on this WWW site was good, long before most of the contributors on this thread had even joined.
My own $0.02.
58 C6 RS6 Stage 2+
58 C6 A6 Allroad 2.7 TDi
Previous:
2000 B5 S4 MRC 550 Saloon
2007 B7 RS4 Saloon
1994 S2 Coupe