RS4 B7 Stated Power claim of 420ps

4.2 V8 32v Naturally Aspirated - 414 bhp
Locked
User avatar
sonny
Cruising
Posts: 10278
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:30 am
Location: Kent

Post by sonny » Wed Mar 03, 2010 2:17 pm

Iv to been reading the thread on RS6, interesting.
Money can't buy you love, but it can buy you a well sorted racecar

User avatar
Terry1948
4th Gear
Posts: 512
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:08 pm
Location: Suffolk

Post by Terry1948 » Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:32 pm

So it would appear that all FSI engines from all manufacturers suffer from carbon build up and that over time this may/will impact on performance, if this is every 50-70,000 miles I can live with that at least I have no cam belt to change. There seems to be no cure unless you want to ditch the big V8 and go electric oh decisions, decisions. It was interesting to see porches valves thought it was a RS4.

HYFR
Cruising
Posts: 15568
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:02 pm

Post by HYFR » Wed Mar 03, 2010 4:03 pm

im so bored of this subject now its untrue

my car has been in with Audi for about a week now, been driving around in a A3 1.8T. I cant wait to get back into the RS 4

pad125
4th Gear
Posts: 564
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 3:11 pm
Location: Shepperton

Post by pad125 » Wed Mar 03, 2010 4:13 pm

also I see the RS5 has the same donkey we have just with more horses so unless Audi are incredibly stupid (stop laughing at the back) you'd think they wouldn’t continue with this engine....would they?

HYFR
Cruising
Posts: 15568
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:02 pm

Post by HYFR » Wed Mar 03, 2010 5:09 pm

pad125 wrote:also I see the RS5 has the same donkey we have just with more horses so unless Audi are incredibly stupid (stop laughing at the back) you'd think they wouldn’t continue with this engine....would they?
DRC?

lengster1
Cruising
Posts: 3052
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 3:00 pm

Post by lengster1 » Wed Mar 03, 2010 5:14 pm

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ boring boring boring,my mates just coughed up £3k for a major service on his 996t and then had some kind person key it,my arse is staying firmly in the rs4 name me a better 4 door car that is quick all year round,good build quality,good depreciation etc etc then il think about jumping ship,any 400bhp car is highly unlikely to make bang on its power,the last dyno session had b5s that should make 420 producing 380 so what!!! If your that bothered dont buy one or sell the one you have but tell me what your buying thats better as im all ears!!

User avatar
pippyrips
Top Gear
Posts: 1691
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:40 am

Post by pippyrips » Wed Mar 03, 2010 5:26 pm

davidkoulakis wrote:
pad125 wrote:also I see the RS5 has the same donkey we have just with more horses so unless Audi are incredibly stupid (stop laughing at the back) you'd think they wouldn’t continue with this engine....would they?
DRC?
Good point, well made - guess you can't be that bored ;)

User avatar
PetrolDave
Cruising
Posts: 7599
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 11:28 am
Location: Southampton, Hampshire UK

Post by PetrolDave » Wed Mar 03, 2010 8:18 pm

Marcus-RS4 wrote:Google is your friend:

http://www.rs6.com/showthread.php/0?p=185787
i don't see a source at Audi or quattro quoted in that link - just a pst from a member called Qisha who has an avatar that uses the Audi logo - which IMHO doesn't make him/her a source within Audi.

User avatar
ArthurPE
Cruising
Posts: 3755
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 3:15 am
Location: USA

Post by ArthurPE » Wed Mar 03, 2010 8:18 pm

so it is not from Audi AG, as the VP Audi NA relayed to me...and no where in the post does he claim it to be...

I will forward him this link, thanks Marcus
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe...Albert Einstein

User avatar
ArthurPE
Cruising
Posts: 3755
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 3:15 am
Location: USA

Post by ArthurPE » Wed Mar 03, 2010 8:19 pm

PetrolDave wrote:
Marcus-RS4 wrote:Google is your friend:

http://www.rs6.com/showthread.php/0?p=185787
i don't see a source at Audi or quattro quoted in that link - just a pst from a member called Qisha who has an avatar that uses the Audi logo - which IMHO doesn't make him/her a source within Audi.

that's becasue it is NOT from Audi

User avatar
Sims
Top Gear
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:17 pm

Post by Sims » Thu Mar 04, 2010 4:46 pm

davidkoulakis wrote:im so bored of this subject now its untrue

my car has been in with Audi for about a week now, been driving around in a A3 1.8T. I cant wait to get back into the RS 4
David, any progress on your car?

svassileou
2nd Gear
Posts: 217
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 4:02 pm

Post by svassileou » Thu Mar 04, 2010 5:10 pm

Hang on, CW20/2007? Not that this matters much but there can't have been that many built this late into the production cycle, surely?

User avatar
PetrolDave
Cruising
Posts: 7599
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 11:28 am
Location: Southampton, Hampshire UK

Post by PetrolDave » Thu Mar 04, 2010 5:31 pm

ArthurPE wrote:that's becasue it is NOT from Audi
So given that there appear to be factual errors in his post (no changed parts after week 20 2007, rings are not in the head,...) IMHO Qisha's "opinions" shouldnot be given any more crediblity than any other (apparently) non-technical owners' opinions.

User avatar
Sims
Top Gear
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:17 pm

Post by Sims » Thu Mar 04, 2010 5:36 pm

PetrolDave wrote:
ArthurPE wrote:that's becasue it is NOT from Audi
So given that there appear to be factual errors in his post (no changed parts after week 20 2007, rings are not in the head,...) IMHO Qisha's "opinions" shouldnot be given any more crediblity than any other (apparently) non-technical owners' opinions.
or be patient & keep an open mind. This issue has been raised by more than one person, in more than one continent. :)

User avatar
PetrolDave
Cruising
Posts: 7599
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 11:28 am
Location: Southampton, Hampshire UK

Post by PetrolDave » Thu Mar 04, 2010 6:28 pm

sims wrote:or be patient & keep an open mind. This issue has been raised by more than one person, in more than one continent. :)
The supposed issue of power loss due to coking up has been raised and discussed ad infinitum, so there's already a lot of opinions and some fact in the public domain.

Another post that contains factual inaccuracies adds nothing to the current state of knowledge, so there's nothing to wait for or keep an open mind about regarding the post by Qisha.

Locked

Return to “RS4 (B7 Typ 8E) 2006–2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 81 guests