
Amazingly and probably expectedly Warranty Direct have no record of my agreement that states that they will allow the move from DRC to coilovers (dick head from sales didnt put it on my notes on the system) when the DRC fails (again). The mananger there says she will have a listen to all the phone calls i made / were made to me when i took the policy out as verbal agreement is as good as paper when you have a recording. Should be no problem there.
In my defence / reasons for conversion:-
Am i right in thinking that: (DRC), if one shock is leaking and in need of replacement then two would need to be replaced due to them being linked? Hence the reason to move to coilovers due to the greater cost of DRC.
Having checked the cars service history the DRC has been overhalled twice, and both times the shocks have been changed in pairs. Is this as above?
In actual fact, even if they only have to change 1 shocker the bill will be greater than the coliover conversion so it doesnt really make much odds. But if i am right about the link between the corners then it should be a no brainer in my opinion. Why didnt the cock at sales just make a note eh? Im sure he'll get his comeuppance from the manager tommorrow.
Also, for reference when the garage fit the new kit, what height are you guys running your PSS9's at? Im gonna go for bump setting 4 as per Grizz and some others, but ive got a bell ringing that says that the PSS9's need to be cranked to the top to maintain the correct ride height. Any advice (i believe its easier when its off the car rather than on?)?
Cheers guys, Eddie