Results:
462PS @ 5935
385PS at the wheels.
583Nm @ 3118 (approx, because the autobox screws up the calculation, apparently)
So I'm officially used to the car's performance then

I was tempted. I was offered a tailored ECU and TCU map on the spot, but I don't make decisions under pressureecain63 wrote:Get it mapped and that will bring back the smile to your face.
But you did make a decision - not to get it mapped. Wrong decision IMHO!!I don't make decisions under pressure
yupDaveperc wrote:But you did make a decision - not to get it mapped. Wrong decision IMHO!!I don't make decisions under pressure
Dave
After reading Quisha's comments on the American forum about the longevity of the transmission when chipped, I'd say you made the right decision!davidkoulakis wrote:yupDaveperc wrote:But you did make a decision - not to get it mapped. Wrong decision IMHO!!I don't make decisions under pressure
Dave
I agree. I have researched various forums and it seems that there are plenty people suffer gearbox problems that do not have a re-map, basically proving what David said above. My car is mapped to 570bhp by MTM and the gearbox is still going strong after 25,000 very enjoyable miles.davidkoulakis wrote:to be fair, the gearbox is weak line even in standard mode...and getting the TCU mapped along with the ECU will reduce the added stress
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], rs4wagon and 61 guests