To VAG-Com users, FATS times database for the Euro S4s

[buzzard]

just done my run--totally stock apart from forge dv's

12 seconds and it felt like an eternity!!!



Rpm-----airmass—throttle--timing
3080----138.86----100%----11.3
3240----148.78----100%----9.8
3440----155.11----100%----11.3
3560----158.58----100%----9.8
3840----162.17----100%----14.3
4000----167.86----100%----12.8
4120----169.83----100%----9.8
4280----172.69----100%----10.5
4400----177.67----100%----13.5
4600----182.69----100%----14.3
4760----187.17----100%----12.0
4880----190.25----100%----13.5
5040----192.92----100%----14.3
5160----196.72----100%----14.3
5280----201.14----100%----14.5
5400----203.00----100%----16.5
5520----203.86----100%----18.0
5640----206.03----100%----18.0
5760----209..22----100%----19.5
5920----211.61----100%----19.5
6080----210.97----100%----17.3
6120----215.31----100%----19.5
6240----214.11----100%----18.0
6360-----214.72----100%----24.8
6440----215.31----100%----21.0
6520----217.11----100%----20.3
6640----214.11----100%----22.5
6680----213.50----100%----20.3
6720----217.03----100%----20.3
6800----214.61----32.2%----15.8

anyone think this is ok for a stock motor ?

[JonnyX]

it's 3rd gear. How did you work out 12 seconds? Normally VAG-COM is 3.3 samples/s for sampling one
group. You have approx 20 samples between the measured points which indicate a FATs time of ~7secs
which is about right for stock.

I would expect a 1.6 Golf to do 60 - 95 in 12 secs!

[buzzard]

cheers. car still feels a bit off the boil and not long done the MAF

whats best way for checking air leaks .

[Nige_RS4]

MAF figures look OK. Log block 115 and see what the boost is doing.

[buzzard]

will do nige

[buzzard]

just done a run on 115 and boost figures look all ok

must be getting to used to the 265 and ready for an upgrade!!!

[confusionhunter]

did a couple more runs with my std S4 with MTM chip.... weight seems to make a big diff.... I had a mate in the car and got 6 sec. By myself and 1/4 tank at ten degrees temp I got 5.39 (slight downhill i guess!!??)and A 5.54 , I put a 1/4 tank of fuel in (no optimax in sight!) and bought a bottle of gas (30kg maybe?) and went up to 6.05....... all seem consistant....Good stuff...

BTW.... does anyone have alink to this page that works out HP in Minheas oginal post?

"Here is also a FATS to HP calculator, seems pretty close to my estimations (I used 3770lbs for my car in this run, it comes up with 354 crank HP, I did come up with 350 HP based on the MAF output. http://www.vastperformance.com/faq.html "
Cheers.
Mark.

[jeffw]

http://www.vastperformance.com/faq.php

[DavidT]

Here is another from my K04 car, now with RS4 airbox & MAF, 3.59

58.76 3440 198.33 100 12
59.08 3640 202.5 100 10.5
59.38 3880 234.53 100 9
59.68 4080 257.58 100 8.3
59.99 4280 281.56 100 9
60.31 4520 291.58 100 9.8
60.63 4760 295.69 100 12
60.95 5000 300.14 100 13.5
61.29 5200 310.08 100 15.8
61.65 5440 318.61 100 15
62.01 5680 331.19 100 16.5
62.36 5880 335.81 100 14.3
62.73 6080 346.75 100 17.3
63.1 6280 345.72 100 15.8
63.49 6520 342.72 100 19.5
63.86 6680 331.92 100 20.3
64.25 6840 331.92 100 23.3
64.62 7040 329.03 100 27

[dazzer]

Holy cow David

[ZeroK66]

I shall be getting my VAG-COM in the next few days and shall be experimenting.

[MarkB]

Did a quick FATS run on the way home from work...

2.32 2680 115.25 100 12.8
2.72 2840 163.72 100 7.5
3.23 3160 191.31 100 8.3
3.73 3440 213.75 100 8.3
4.13 3680 226.47 100 7.5
4.64 3960 227.69 100 6.8
5.14 4200 236.78 100 6
5.66 4480 246.47 100 4.5
6.19 4720 253.83 100 5.3
6.62 4920 255.94 100 6.8
7.07 5120 258.72 100 7.5
7.53 5280 262.31 100 7.5
7.98 5480 263.56 100 8.3
8.46 5640 269.5 100 9
8.93 5840 268.72 100 11.3
9.42 6000 271.75 100 12.8
9.9 6120 274 100 13.5
10.4 6280 278.42 100 13.5
10.89 6440 279.19 100 14.3
11.4 6600 283.64 100 15
11.92 6720 282.86 100 17.3
12.43 6840 282.86 100 17.3


5.94 seconds...

Anyone care to comment on the health of my car? AMD remap and Miltek cat back.

Cheers

[MarkB]

Did a quick FATS run on the way home from work...

2.32 2680 115.25 100 12.8
2.72 2840 163.72 100 7.5
3.23 3160 191.31 100 8.3
3.73 3440 213.75 100 8.3
4.13 3680 226.47 100 7.5
4.64 3960 227.69 100 6.8
5.14 4200 236.78 100 6
5.66 4480 246.47 100 4.5
6.19 4720 253.83 100 5.3
6.62 4920 255.94 100 6.8
7.07 5120 258.72 100 7.5
7.53 5280 262.31 100 7.5
7.98 5480 263.56 100 8.3
8.46 5640 269.5 100 9
8.93 5840 268.72 100 11.3
9.42 6000 271.75 100 12.8
9.9 6120 274 100 13.5
10.4 6280 278.42 100 13.5
10.89 6440 279.19 100 14.3
11.4 6600 283.64 100 15
11.92 6720 282.86 100 17.3
12.43 6840 282.86 100 17.3


5.94 seconds...

Anyone care to comment on the health of my car? AMD remap and Miltek cat back., about 15 degC ambient

Cheers

[DavidT]

Did a quick FATS run on the way home from work...

2.32 2680 115.25 100 12.8
2.72 2840 163.72 100 7.5
3.23 3160 191.31 100 8.3
3.73 3440 213.75 100 8.3
4.13 3680 226.47 100 7.5
4.64 3960 227.69 100 6.8
5.14 4200 236.78 100 6
5.66 4480 246.47 100 4.5
6.19 4720 253.83 100 5.3
6.62 4920 255.94 100 6.8
7.07 5120 258.72 100 7.5
7.53 5280 262.31 100 7.5
7.98 5480 263.56 100 8.3
8.46 5640 269.5 100 9
8.93 5840 268.72 100 11.3
9.42 6000 271.75 100 12.8
9.9 6120 274 100 13.5
10.4 6280 278.42 100 13.5
10.89 6440 279.19 100 14.3
11.4 6600 283.64 100 15
11.92 6720 282.86 100 17.3
12.43 6840 282.86 100 17.3


5.94 seconds...

Anyone care to comment on the health of my car? AMD remap and Miltek cat back.

Cheers

I'm no expert so can't comment on the figures but if you read through the pages of this thread for similar spec cars (remember to post the spec with yours) you can compare MAF, timing times to see how yours is doing.

[MarkB]

I would say my MAF readings look good but timing low, so will probably do a log to see if the timing retards and the performance/bhp looks low. I think the intercoolers might have been a little hot as I'd just come out of a 30 zone...