Page 1 of 3

Mrc stage 1 vs stage 2 manifold

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 8:10 pm
by Rw@@dy
Is there much difference between the power advantage of the stages of manifold? The flaps have started to stick on mine so I'm think it could be a good time to get this work done along with a stage 2 map

Re: Mrc stage 1 vs stage 2 manifold

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 10:00 pm
by JmRS4
I had the flaps removed in my manifold when having the stage 2 map and carbon clean. Dunno which stage of manifold it was though! Car feels completely different but suppose it should!

Re: Mrc stage 1 vs stage 2 manifold

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 10:15 pm
by RichieRS
From what I have read across many forums, it seems any manifold work yields a minimal power increase.

Re: Mrc stage 1 vs stage 2 manifold

Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2016 6:31 am
by Rw@@dy
Let me know how you get on rich

Re: Mrc stage 1 vs stage 2 manifold

Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2016 6:59 am
by RichieRS
Rw@@dy wrote:Let me know how you get on rich
Will do buddy :thumbs:

Re: Mrc stage 1 vs stage 2 manifold

Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2016 9:59 am
by RossDagley
For balance, I must say that I didn't like the part-throttle response of a deflapped manifold. It lost the smoothness (refinement) of pickup that the flaps give (obviously). Each to their own, but if I were doing it again, I'd probably keep the flaps despite the fact they are a magnet for slime/carbon.

Re: Mrc stage 1 vs stage 2 manifold

Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2016 11:55 am
by Rw@@dy
Thanks for that, always good to have a balanced opinion. Have to say don't think I'd like it if it changed the driving charactisitics much

Re: Mrc stage 1 vs stage 2 manifold

Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2016 2:32 pm
by RichieRS
RossDagley wrote:For balance, I must say that I didn't like the part-throttle response of a deflapped manifold. It lost the smoothness (refinement) of pickup that the flaps give (obviously). Each to their own, but if I were doing it again, I'd probably keep the flaps despite the fact they are a magnet for slime/carbon.
I have a feeling the throttle response smoothness or lack of will be accentuated by the on/off of the stage 2 map as well.

Re: Mrc stage 1 vs stage 2 manifold

Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2016 2:36 pm
by RossDagley
Yes it might be me being over-critical. I had to go back and ask Doug to 'tone down' my throttle pot as it was too jerky for me - really didn't like it. After that it was much better (and a good improvement over standard of course). So I'm probably just picky!

Re: Mrc stage 1 vs stage 2 manifold

Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2016 7:40 pm
by Frostie
At least if the flaps are removed, you dont need to worry about the bolts coming loose and dropping in the engine...

Re: Mrc stage 1 vs stage 2 manifold

Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2016 8:18 pm
by RichieRS
Frostie wrote:At least if the flaps are removed, you dont need to worry about the bolts coming loose and dropping in the engine...
There a nice example just gone up on Audizine of this happening!!.

Re: Mrc stage 1 vs stage 2 manifold

Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2016 8:25 pm
by Frostie
That was one of my main reasons for having it done... Preventative maintenance

Re: Mrc stage 1 vs stage 2 manifold

Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2016 9:20 pm
by RossDagley
How many b7 rs4's are there, and how many have had the bolts come loose? I'm afraid I'm rather of the opinion you're mitigating a risk so small it's immeasurable.

Re: Mrc stage 1 vs stage 2 manifold

Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2016 9:30 pm
by Frostie
Weighing it up.. I'd rather pay for a de-flap then have the hassle and expense of a new engine being fitted...

Re: Mrc stage 1 vs stage 2 manifold

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 7:39 am
by RichieRS
RossDagley wrote:How many b7 rs4's are there, and how many have had the bolts come loose? I'm afraid I'm rather of the opinion you're mitigating a risk so small it's immeasurable.

I've only heard of this happening once or twice I think. My reasoning for removal was purely performance and carbon deterrent based but it does tend to get people worrying when someone comes out with pics like that!!!