Pics of my carbon build up!

4.2 V8 32v Naturally Aspirated - 414 bhp
User avatar
Steve_C
Top Gear
Posts: 2095
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 10:07 pm
Location: Pork pies and stilton
Contact:

Post by Steve_C » Fri Feb 18, 2011 12:06 am

neckarsulm wrote:
IIRC, I was taking 9.0-9.5 secs for the 3k-8k run. Am now taking 7.9 secs.
What measuring device were you using Steve?
Using the on board lap timer. Whilst I accept this is not necessarily accurate in absolute terms I was careful to be consistent to ensure starting errors and stopping errors cancel out. This obviously means I may have been measuring 2.9k - 7.9k or 3.1k to 8.1k but the reduction in times of ~1.5 secs should be fairly valid.

I think Arthur previously calculated for me that 7.9secs for an Avant running 434PS was about right based on his wealth of data?
Gone to the dark side

neckarsulm
Cruising
Posts: 4468
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: The Point

Post by neckarsulm » Fri Feb 18, 2011 8:50 am

Using the on board lap timer. Whilst I accept this is not necessarily accurate in absolute terms I was careful to be consistent to ensure starting errors and stopping errors cancel out. This obviously means I may have been measuring 2.9k - 7.9k or 3.1k to 8.1k but the reduction in times of ~1.5 secs should be fairly valid.

I think Arthur previously calculated for me that 7.9secs for an Avant running 434PS was about right based on his wealth of data?
fair point. Would be interesting to see how quickly times go back up when it gets dirty again.

It would be good if there was more talk of a permanent fix than this temporary cleaning which doesn't fix the problem.
[youtube]https://youtu.be/-I1Ok9LTn6o[/youtube]

User avatar
Steve_C
Top Gear
Posts: 2095
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 10:07 pm
Location: Pork pies and stilton
Contact:

Post by Steve_C » Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:05 am

neckarsulm wrote:It would be good if there was more talk of a permanent fix than this temporary cleaning which doesn't fix the problem.
Absolutely, but in the meantime it'll just have to be a regular Italian tune up!
Gone to the dark side

HYFR
Cruising
Posts: 15568
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:02 pm

Post by HYFR » Fri Feb 18, 2011 9:17 pm

Steve_C wrote:Previous owner did 20k miles pa for 3 yrs. Mostly sitting at 3500rpm on the motorway. Serviced by Audi on long life approx every 12 months.
so did my old one, but still pulled 380PS on MRC dyno

:?:

User avatar
Steve_C
Top Gear
Posts: 2095
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 10:07 pm
Location: Pork pies and stilton
Contact:

Post by Steve_C » Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:09 pm

Previous owner also said most of the time the car was run on normal unleaded rather than V power. Could this have had an effect?
Gone to the dark side

HYFR
Cruising
Posts: 15568
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:02 pm

Post by HYFR » Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:21 pm

Yes, a bigger effect over those miles I'd imagine

droll
Neutral
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 6:18 pm

Post by droll » Sat Feb 19, 2011 5:42 am

sorry for my ignorance but how would bad fuel contribute to the CB if the fuel is only injected into the combustion chamber and has no chance to clean (or dirty) the valves?

i've read a lost of posts on the CB but can't quite get my head around 2 things: the above and how revving to 8k etc would also reduce the buildup issue (since this makes the engine hotter and the oil hotter which would mean cooking the oil and contributing to more carbon)??

2manytoys
2nd Gear
Posts: 227
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 7:54 am
Location: Australia

Post by 2manytoys » Mon Feb 21, 2011 12:45 pm

I'm surprised this is still being debated.

I don't think any amount of "good" driving is going to keep the carbon at bay. I suspect the problem is valve stem seals. In fact, I've recently seen the inside of a 2.0T with 80,000km (about 50,000 miles) where oddly No'1 cylinder valves weren't too bad, but; 2, 3 and 4 were very bad. Head off, a clean and new valve stem seals and the car is back on the road with improved top end.

I'd probably say that those getting bad carbon buildup will probably be in the same situation in a year or so (maybe 12,000 miles or so) after the clean. Once the seals are worn the problem is going to get worse and happen faster.

Anyway, anyone interested in some dyno graphs and timing information about what carbon can do should have a look here: http://www.audizine.com/forum/showthrea ... and-graphs

neckarsulm
Cruising
Posts: 4468
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: The Point

Post by neckarsulm » Mon Feb 21, 2011 1:32 pm

I'm surprised this is still being debated.

I don't think any amount of "good" driving is going to keep the carbon at bay. I suspect the problem is valve stem seals. In fact, I've recently seen the inside of a 2.0T with 80,000km (about 50,000 miles) where oddly No'1 cylinder valves weren't too bad, but; 2, 3 and 4 were very bad. Head off, a clean and new valve stem seals and the car is back on the road with improved top end.

I'd probably say that those getting bad carbon buildup will probably be in the same situation in a year or so (maybe 12,000 miles or so) after the clean. Once the seals are worn the problem is going to get worse and happen faster.

Anyway, anyone interested in some dyno graphs and timing information about what carbon can do should have a look here: http://www.audizine.com/forum/showthrea ... and-graphs
Is the fuel or oil quality of Australia or USA significantly different to ours thus negating the scientific element of any comparison with ours?
[youtube]https://youtu.be/-I1Ok9LTn6o[/youtube]

2manytoys
2nd Gear
Posts: 227
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 7:54 am
Location: Australia

Post by 2manytoys » Mon Feb 21, 2011 9:51 pm

We use Shell Optimax 98 RON and Castrol SLX Professional Longlife III. http://www.castrol.com/castrol/extended ... Id=7061123

I don't think it's fuel, but it could be oil?? Maybe those that don't have a lot of carbon don't have worn valve stem seals. Maybe a different oil could help to prevent the valve stem seals from wearing, hence less carbon, but who knows???

neckarsulm
Cruising
Posts: 4468
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: The Point

Post by neckarsulm » Mon Feb 21, 2011 10:24 pm

Maybe a different oil could help to prevent the valve stem seals from wearing, hence less carbon, but who knows???
Only she knows (the carbon fairy)
Attachments
carbonfairy.jpg
carbonfairy.jpg (5.58 KiB) Viewed 1066 times
[youtube]https://youtu.be/-I1Ok9LTn6o[/youtube]

User avatar
sonny
Cruising
Posts: 10278
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 1:30 am
Location: Kent

Post by sonny » Mon Feb 21, 2011 10:29 pm

LOL +1 to the Carbon Fairy.
Money can't buy you love, but it can buy you a well sorted racecar

2manytoys
2nd Gear
Posts: 227
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 7:54 am
Location: Australia

Post by 2manytoys » Tue Feb 22, 2011 2:32 am

haaaaaa can you get them as bumper stickers?

neckarsulm
Cruising
Posts: 4468
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: The Point

Post by neckarsulm » Tue Feb 22, 2011 8:42 am

haaaaaa can you get them as bumper stickers?
....the stickers are going to be supplied free with each clean up, redesigned like Ghostbusters logo - circle with a red X over the top of the fairy and slogan of "I aint a fraid of no soot" :)
[youtube]https://youtu.be/-I1Ok9LTn6o[/youtube]

User avatar
Steve_C
Top Gear
Posts: 2095
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 10:07 pm
Location: Pork pies and stilton
Contact:

Post by Steve_C » Tue Feb 22, 2011 11:26 am

:jump:
Gone to the dark side

Post Reply

Return to “RS4 (B7 Typ 8E) 2006–2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests