Silas wrote:Good to hear your pleased with the results, however I do think AMD big the gains up, compared to rolling road at MRC,anybody else see this??

Silas wrote:Good to hear your pleased with the results, however I do think AMD big the gains up, compared to rolling road at MRC,anybody else see this??
I have 450 and it took all of my sig to get there at MRC. Always been a bit sceptical of AMD's claims although judging by what Okis car already has on it a decoke and AMD map could get there, especially if the manifold has been done and you dont know.sar wrote:Silas wrote:Good to hear your pleased with the results, however I do think AMD big the gains up, compared to rolling road at MRC,anybody else see this??... normally to get 450 bhp out of an rs4 it needs everything but the kitchen sink throwing at it.
Indeed.sakimano wrote: I would much rather know what my car is capable of in certain acceleration tests...and of course I would rather just drive my car.
Depends how cynical you arespikeyboy101 wrote:Would agree that AMD figs do seem to come out a bit high - having said that they do a before and after run so you can see the "over all" change.
I guess that's possible. However my car, bone stock, ran the quarter mile at a certified dragstrip in 12.75 @ 108 (in other words faster than any magazine to ever test a stock rs4), so ignorance if that's what you call it is fine by me.Silas wrote:Saki the reason why you don't dyno is because your car is probably running 360, ignorance is bliss
I had a stage 2 map already, albeit from another supplier improving top end, but I didnt like the throttle response it gave. Not entirely sure how the age of the vehicle is relevant. I see some fantastically disfunctional engines not a year oldMikeFish wrote:His signature says MRC stage 2 430bhp so it sounds like he has had other work done, be it before or after the decoke I don't know. One things for sure, you wont be getting 430bhp out of a 6 year old RS4 with a standard engine, decoke or not. I suspect if he went from 370 to 430 he had decoke and stage 2 at the same time.OskiRs4 wrote:Hi mate was that just a carbon clean? No other work?mark758 wrote:My pre / post figures on an MRC de-coke were 370/430 - both results taken on the Banbury RR.
Definitely feel 60bhpImprovements to my engine airflow were outstanding.
his car ran one of the fastest times I've ever seen for a stock or modded NA RS4Silas wrote:Saki the reason why you don't dyno is because your car is probably running 360, ignorance is bliss
I think the Arthur test is the best way to test the benefits of a carbon clean, not a dynoCovkiller wrote:My RS4 has a Revo map
MRC Dyno’d on Monday @ 399.4PS
Doug mentioned it could do with a carbon clean. So it’s booked in this Thursday for a full clean, valves, stems, inlet manifold etc. The car will be put back to standard with no mods to the inlet manifold other than porting and polishing.
Revo said they’ll remap my car free of charge once done and MRC says they’ll re-dyno it afterwards.
This should prove interesting and lay to rest all of the questions asked in forums as to the benefits of an RS4 B7 Carbon Clean.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 111 guests