RS4 B7 Stated Power claim of 420ps

4.2 V8 32v Naturally Aspirated - 414 bhp
Locked
User avatar
Sims
Top Gear
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:17 pm

Post by Sims » Thu Mar 04, 2010 10:31 pm

davidkoulakis wrote:
sims wrote:
davidkoulakis wrote:im so bored of this subject now its untrue

my car has been in with Audi for about a week now, been driving around in a A3 1.8T. I cant wait to get back into the RS 4
David, any progress on your car?
still there....awaiting authorisation from warranty company...think they've clocked up 10hrs of labour so far taking it apart, which at £110ph isnt cheap!
I take it you are not paying that... or are you?

HYFR
Cruising
Posts: 15568
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:02 pm

Post by HYFR » Thu Mar 04, 2010 10:39 pm

LOL !!

not a chance...Audi warranty

:beerchug:

User avatar
Sims
Top Gear
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:17 pm

Post by Sims » Thu Mar 04, 2010 10:50 pm

davidkoulakis wrote:LOL !!

not a chance...Audi warranty

:beerchug:


:thumbs:

User avatar
ArthurPE
Cruising
Posts: 3755
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 3:15 am
Location: USA

Post by ArthurPE » Thu Mar 04, 2010 10:55 pm

sims wrote: Ok, get something from Audi (you are very close to them) and post it on here to say the engine was never changed before resorting to accusations again.
Anybody can see it on the Audi parts list

How many people on that forum questioned him - I think 1. That is one person, not people.
read his other postts...he's a clown, and fraudualent if he purports or misleads/implies that came from Audi, I know for fact it did NOT

At the outset, I stated I was not at all technical. But in my field, I gather data and rely on my judgment calls all day every day.
gawd have mercy on your 'clients'
so does a barber, but he doesn't know squat about cars, lol


You tell me.
None

so you are suggesting all these people are defrauding customers?
yes, selling them a bill of goods, taking advantage of them

so we are back to accusing people of lying.. (the word you had used before editing to mis-truth)
I changed it because you probably don't know you're wrong (or do you?)

User avatar
Sims
Top Gear
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:17 pm

Post by Sims » Thu Mar 04, 2010 11:03 pm

ArthurPE wrote:
sims wrote: Ok, get something from Audi (you are very close to them) and post it on here to say the engine was never changed before resorting to accusations again.
Anybody can see it on the Audi parts list

How many people on that forum questioned him - I think 1. That is one person, not people.
read his other postts...he's a clown, and fraudualent if he purports or misleads/implies that came from Audi, I know for fact it did NOT

At the outset, I stated I was not at all technical. But in my field, I gather data and rely on my judgment calls all day every day.
gawd have mercy on your 'clients'
so does a barber, but he doesn't know squat about cars, lol


You tell me.
None

so you are suggesting all these people are defrauding customers?
yes, selling them a bill of goods, taking advantage of them

so we are back to accusing people of lying.. (the word you had used before editing to mis-truth)
I changed it because you probably don't know you're wrong (or do you?)
You have accused me of lying before, without foundation. You continue to do so and resort to insults. Sad
Last edited by Sims on Thu Mar 04, 2010 11:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
ArthurPE
Cruising
Posts: 3755
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 3:15 am
Location: USA

Post by ArthurPE » Thu Mar 04, 2010 11:04 pm

sims wrote: A dozen members!! That is not at all scientific - how many variables can there be - outside temp, passenger weight, physical & mental response of person, road gradient, fuel in car,esp on, sports button on maybe etc etc - as an engineer you will know all that but you are denying the law of logic.
at least a dozen, > 50 runs, with the following factored in:
passenger?
any extra weight
fuel load
OA temp
grade
road condition, ie, wet, damp, etc.
valves cleaned?
multiple runs by the same operator avg out timing error

the std dev was very small...high confidence interval

actually it is quite conclusive, my contact at Audi found it very interesting also...far more reliable that anything else I've seen posted...

User avatar
ArthurPE
Cruising
Posts: 3755
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 3:15 am
Location: USA

Post by ArthurPE » Thu Mar 04, 2010 11:08 pm

sims wrote: OK
so you agree:
no parts change
quisha = BS
I have no vested interest
and vendors are using deposits to con customers

cool

User avatar
Sims
Top Gear
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:17 pm

Post by Sims » Thu Mar 04, 2010 11:09 pm

ArthurPE wrote:
sims wrote: A dozen members!! That is not at all scientific - how many variables can there be - outside temp, passenger weight, physical & mental response of person, road gradient, fuel in car,esp on, sports button on maybe etc etc - as an engineer you will know all that but you are denying the law of logic.
at least a dozen, > 50 runs, with the following factored in:
passenger?
any extra weight
fuel load
OA temp
grade
road condition, ie, wet, damp, etc.
valves cleaned?
multiple runs by the same operator avg out timing error

the std dev was very small...high confidence interval

actually it is quite conclusive, my contact at Audi found it very interesting also...far more reliable that anything else I've seen posted...
So who is your contact at Audi?

User avatar
Sims
Top Gear
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:17 pm

Post by Sims » Thu Mar 04, 2010 11:10 pm

ArthurPE wrote:
sims wrote: OK
so you agree:
no parts change
quisha = BS
I have no vested interest
and vendors are using deposits to con customers

cool
Not at all, see above. Nice try though :lol:

User avatar
ArthurPE
Cruising
Posts: 3755
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 3:15 am
Location: USA

Post by ArthurPE » Thu Mar 04, 2010 11:18 pm

sims wrote:
So who is your contact at Audi?
it's been posted, here and elsewhere...

I'll not let you guys sabotage the open communication that seems to be happening...

do your own research...I'll do mine....

I wrote him on company letter head, figuring a president of an engineering firm might get a bit more attention...what the heck, I'm the majority owner, and put up with a lot of flack from the job, might as well enjoy the perks...

User avatar
Sims
Top Gear
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 5:17 pm

Post by Sims » Thu Mar 04, 2010 11:21 pm

ArthurPE wrote:
sims wrote:
So who is your contact at Audi?
it's been posted, here and elsewhere...

I'll not let you guys sabotage the open communication that seems to be happening...

do your own research...I'll do mine....

I wrote him on company letter head, figuring a president of an engineering firm might get a bit more attention...what the heck, I'm the majority owner, and put up with a lot of flack from the job, might as well enjoy the perks...
:)

User avatar
ArthurPE
Cruising
Posts: 3755
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 3:15 am
Location: USA

Post by ArthurPE » Thu Mar 04, 2010 11:28 pm

people will accuse him of:
fraud
deciet
threat of loss of business
lawsuits
etc.

all that will do is put them in 'lawyer up' mode and no one will benefit...it will stretch things out indefinitely...
then what would you guys have to whine about? lol

he's in Germany this week anyways ;)

User avatar
S2tuner
Trader (Expired)
Posts: 1559
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 10:35 am
Location: Oxfordshire

Post by S2tuner » Fri Mar 05, 2010 1:02 am

Arthur, while I appreciate all your efforts, I don't appreciate you calling ALL vendors offering to clean up intake ports at the demand of customers, defrauds who con customers, at least NOT when you do not know of whom you are talking about. I will appreciate it if you used more PC language, because the wording used might upset a few of those vendors.

User avatar
ArthurPE
Cruising
Posts: 3755
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 3:15 am
Location: USA

Post by ArthurPE » Fri Mar 05, 2010 2:43 am

I'm sorry if I offended some vendors...my sympathy goes out to them if I offended their sensibilities...
my real concern is for the owner who shells out hard earned $$$ for something, that imho, does not benefit him as much as it does the aggrieved 'vendor'...I know, buyer beware and all, but soem folks are not technical so I try to give them perspective...

I know this:
deposits form
their growth seems to be limited at some volume
from pics it seems that they reach 90% of that volume at a relatively low mileage, maybe 3-4k miles...and max out at 8k or less...
so cleaning them, if you believe the HP loss claim, only buys you 5k miles max for $1000...that seems steep for a couple of % HP that you can seldom use on public highways...and if there is NO loss, a complete waste of $$$
now what do I get out of this, compared to the owner?
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe...Albert Einstein

User avatar
johneroberts
Cruising
Posts: 4483
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 11:38 pm
Location: Clent Hills
Contact:

Post by johneroberts » Fri Mar 05, 2010 10:26 am

Play nicely now boys or this thread WILL be locked..
Had some complaints and if it goes down the road of abusive it goes aginst the rules of the forum.
Your choice
jr
Image
Driving is believing
RS246 Founder

Locked

Return to “RS4 (B7 Typ 8E) 2006–2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 93 guests