ArthurPE wrote:quisha does not work for Audi
he does not represent Audi
that stuff you post is NOT from Audi
if he says the rings are in the head, he IS less believable
I accept that as your position, and do agree with you about the rings.
what's the 'misguided' belief?Sims wrote:
I am surprised at you.
You really ought to read posts properly before hurling abuse and accusations, mostly attempting to defend some cause in a misguided belief.
ArthurPE wrote:what's the 'misguided' belief?Sims wrote:
I am surprised at you.
You really ought to read posts properly before hurling abuse and accusations, mostly attempting to defend some cause in a misguided belief.
deposits cost power or they don't?
so you are 'right', and those who disagree are 'wrong'?
thta's all he said, injected with some humor...lighten up
F1 Monaco, 10 minutes!!!! live timing on, check... coffee, hot, check!
yes, being seriousSims wrote: if you are being serious, does the type of oil used affect consumption and carbon build-up?
that is AUDI's position, not mine, at least the response I got when I emailed themSims wrote:ArthurPE wrote:quisha does not work for Audi
he does not represent Audi
that stuff you post is NOT from Audi
if he says the rings are in the head, he IS less believable
I accept that as your position, and do agree with you about the rings.
It's your opinion that it's misguided, but not everyone shares your opinion.Sims wrote:You really ought to read posts properly before hurling abuse and accusations, mostly attempting to defend some cause in a misguided belief.
I was making it easy for you to provide an answer, and yet again you did not.PetrolDave wrote:How come I'm only allowed a yes or no answer yet you can ramble on for several paragraphs?Sims wrote:A Yes or No answer will suffice.
That's not debate - that's censorship.
Sims wrote:I am surprised at you.P_G wrote:On fine form this morning aren't you Sims? The crystal meth not worn off yet? Out to gun everyone down that doesn't comply with your line of thought.
...
You really ought to read posts properly before hurling abuse and accusations, mostly attempting to defend some cause in a misguided belief.
Does everyone share your opinion?PetrolDave wrote: It's your opinion that it's misguided, but not everyone shares your opinion.
You can be as derogatory as you want, but this debate is far from pointless. If it is for you, why do you continue to post on each of these threads? Why are you thwarting the debate on this subject?PetrolDave wrote: Facts and science, neither of which you appear to understand, give the answer to the question - and I repeat my opinion that this debate has become pointless, since IMHO the answers have already been posted - for anyone with the openness of mind and intelligence to read and understand.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 84 guests