Standard airbox versus aftermarket

4.2 V8 32v Naturally Aspirated - 414 bhp
frank
1st Gear
Posts: 97
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2014 7:15 pm

Re: Standard airbox versus aftermarket

Post by frank » Tue Aug 26, 2014 3:04 pm

Thanks again chaps. As said in the comments in the guide, the thought of it all seems very complicated but he made that rather easy to follow.

Could I leave the flap in? I actually quite like the change of noise when it opens.
MRC-TTS Supercharged B7 RS4.

User avatar
PetrolDave
Cruising
Posts: 7599
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 11:28 am
Location: Southampton, Hampshire UK

Re: Standard airbox versus aftermarket

Post by PetrolDave » Tue Aug 26, 2014 5:52 pm

TonyHayers wrote:The argument that manufacturers have designed and tested all parts of a vehicle in a utopian vacuum before it hits the forecourt just doesn't make sense. There are plenty of reasons why development and manufacturing costs are impinged upon and lead to a less than perfect solution.
+1

My daily drive is definitely at the "budget" end of the market (a Citroen C1) and the air intake on that is in about the most stupid possible place - only a few inches away from and right above the pre-cat, so it doesn't take much imagination to work out that on hot days performance is seriously affected as the intake sucks in hot less dense air. All in the name of saving a few cents/pennies...

In most car companies "the bean counters" have to cost reduce something to prove they're worth their jobs, fortunately the RS4 airbox wasn't afflicted in that way!
Gone: 2006 B7 RS4 Avant (Phantom Black)

adsgreen
Cruising
Posts: 5571
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:54 am

Re: Standard airbox versus aftermarket

Post by adsgreen » Tue Aug 26, 2014 6:48 pm

The problem is oem ' s have many various conflicting rules and objectives.

- quiet
- cheap
- easy to mass produce
- effective
- physically fits in the engine bay

Manufacturers like Ferrari who charge a colossal premium can afford to focus on pure performance and be dammed the rest.
Like it or not the RS cars are essentially mass produced and share many components like the air box across many models. As such it is not the 'best' for the car as I'm sure it could be improved. However that being said, in the rs4 ' s case either by luck or design the standard box is more then enough for most applications including forced induction.

User avatar
Surrey Sam
Cruising
Posts: 4195
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 7:34 pm
Location: Sussex

Re: Standard airbox versus aftermarket

Post by Surrey Sam » Tue Aug 26, 2014 8:28 pm

I bought the RS4 because of it's naturally aspirated V8 engine that revs beyond 8200 rpm :rocker: , if something can then enhance that noise with no loss in power then I'm game.

Can't wait to fit my GruppeM.

Sepang Blue B8 RS4, MY14, All option packs, B&O, Adv Key, Adapt Cruise, Pan Roof, Akrapovic Titanium Exhaust, + more.
Previous - Sprint Blue B7 RS4 Avant, Ceramics, Sunroof, SS+, Buckets, FBSW, Bluetooth, 2010+ RNSe
Previous - Phantom Black B7 RS4 Avant, Black Optics, Titan pack, SS+, Buckets, FBSW

Rick_RS4
Cruising
Posts: 2882
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 4:37 pm

Re: Standard airbox versus aftermarket

Post by Rick_RS4 » Tue Aug 26, 2014 10:11 pm

before my exhaust the revolution filter sounded amazing, even the missus noticed the noise and liked it,

there isnt a problem with the revo filter itself then, like it not being able to pass enough air? the problem is the heat soak when sat in traffic etc? also the revo filter is like a cone so it funnels the air into the engine?

these are just my thoughts on the system

adsgreen
Cruising
Posts: 5571
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 9:54 am

Re: Standard airbox versus aftermarket

Post by adsgreen » Wed Aug 27, 2014 8:26 am

Funnel effect is nothing. A lot of cone type filters say that they cause a vortex effect to accelerate and reduce turbulent air. But if you look where it needs to go you can see that's not going to do anything magic.
Most of the problems are down to the material - ironically carbon may look good but it absorbs more heat than plastic.

frank
1st Gear
Posts: 97
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2014 7:15 pm

Re: Standard airbox versus aftermarket

Post by frank » Wed Aug 27, 2014 9:43 am

Is it ok to leave the flap in the airbox? Does it affect performance at all once the cold air feed is fitted?
MRC-TTS Supercharged B7 RS4.

Rick_RS4
Cruising
Posts: 2882
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 4:37 pm

Re: Standard airbox versus aftermarket

Post by Rick_RS4 » Wed Aug 27, 2014 10:34 am

I'd remove the flap and blank off the vac pipe Frank.


Should I take it off for the RR day then? Looking at the surface area the OEM filter is larger too

User avatar
MikeFish
Cruising
Posts: 15588
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:23 pm
Location: The Middle of Somewhere

Re: Standard airbox versus aftermarket

Post by MikeFish » Wed Aug 27, 2014 10:39 am

Rick_RS4 wrote:
Should I take it off for the RR day then? Looking at the surface area the OEM filter is larger too
Depends whether you want to hit as high a number as possible or want to see what you are getting in the daily configuration.

Or do 2 runs? If you get in early then you will have time to swap the mover and do a 2nd run.
To be honest I doubt there will be much difference on a cold engine. Only once that engine compartment heats up will you see any difference.

Rick_RS4
Cruising
Posts: 2882
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 4:37 pm

Re: Standard airbox versus aftermarket

Post by Rick_RS4 » Wed Aug 27, 2014 11:02 pm

im hoping they will do 2 runs and let me swap in between,

ill go standard and wip out the carbon, hopefully that will make their eyes light up and let me fit it. will post results on sunday

Noyjatat
Top Gear
Posts: 1585
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2012 8:12 pm
Location: Ipswich, Suffolk

Re: Standard airbox versus aftermarket

Post by Noyjatat » Wed Aug 27, 2014 11:15 pm

Which rolling road are you heading to Rick?

Rick_RS4
Cruising
Posts: 2882
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 4:37 pm

Re: Standard airbox versus aftermarket

Post by Rick_RS4 » Thu Aug 28, 2014 12:33 am

Noyjatat wrote:Which rolling road are you heading to Rick?

corten miller near skegness, its a local car club im tagging along too, had it on their rollers when i first got it and made 392 i think, now its a little different, hopefully faster

User avatar
TonyHayers
5th Gear
Posts: 1175
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 12:03 am
Location: Leeds

Re: Standard airbox versus aftermarket

Post by TonyHayers » Thu Aug 28, 2014 10:19 am

The problem is that the open intake which allows you to hear more induction noise than the standard airbox also allows more hot air in than the standard airbox.

I kinda like the idea of heavily modifying the standard airbox by putting a huge cold air feed in. Basically, making a rectangular trumpet shape which fits almost the entire aux rad position so giving you plenty of cool air but also acting a bit like a loudspeaker for induction noise. SAI would need to come out to make space though.
06 Phantom Black Saloon:
DONE: Water Meth Injection, Carbon clean at 64k, CAI, Gutted Precats, Non-res x-pipe, H&R 8mm spacers, H&R springs
^ GONE :cry:

frank
1st Gear
Posts: 97
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2014 7:15 pm

Re: Standard airbox versus aftermarket

Post by frank » Thu Aug 28, 2014 12:09 pm

Yes I agree Tony. From what I have read on here I will just be going for a decent cold air feed to standard airbox with some nice heat insulating material around the box.

I still can't see the gains in removing the flap though?
MRC-TTS Supercharged B7 RS4.

User avatar
Covkiller
Top Gear
Posts: 2349
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 3:44 pm
Location: Coventry

Re: Standard airbox versus aftermarket

Post by Covkiller » Thu Aug 28, 2014 12:51 pm

I've left my engine as standard, ie, inlet manifold induction flaps in place, both aux rads left in place and got 442ps after a carbon clean & custom MRC Doug map. Which is healthy in anyones book. The thing that made the big difference was installing my Milltek cat bypass pipes. The car now does 447.9ps.
:smile_smoking:
:sekret:
:rocker:
RS4 B7, Mugello Blue, K&W V3 & HR ARBs, set up by Centre Gravity, Milltek Valved Non Res & cat bypass pipes, BMC air filter, braided hoses, DOT 5.1, Terraclean, MRC Full Carbon Clean, MRC remap 448PS 477NM, 20" S7 alloys with 4mm spacers & Hawke spigots 66.6 > 57.1, AP Racing front discs. Sold Sept 2019. Now rocking an F80 M3

Post Reply

Return to “RS4 (B7 Typ 8E) 2006–2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Minical and 118 guests