Well said.adsgreen wrote:Slight thread drift but yes you right in that free flowing isn't always what you want however 'back pressure' is misunderstood.sar wrote:i very much doubt it, this would kind of negate all free flowing after market exhausts.sonny wrote:( I should know the answer) But I do remember reading that there was a power loss with valves open, due to lack of back pressure, is this something that has been proven wrong?
how could this have even been measured in the first place?.
The ecu and valve timing is setup based on OEM parts and certain assumptions are made. One of these is the exhaust characteristics and as such the timing, overlap and the parameters are set such as to maximise the scavenging effect of the exhaust. If you just change the exhaust then these assumptions are wrong and the benefit you get of a more free flowing exhaust is completely lost (and then some) by miss-matched settings.
This is why you do actually suffer a measurable (if slight) power loss if you just bolt on a miltek. However, remap things to suit the new exhaust and then you do generally get a net gain.
not scientific, for fun only
Re: not scientific, for fun only
Re: not scientific, for fun only
Ok what iPhone app did u use pls? Am keen to give it a go too!
Re: not scientific, for fun only
Unfortunately it's the EU noise regs causing that one. They stipulate a number of speeds and engine rpms <sigh>.sakimano wrote:sonny wrote: Closing of the exhaust valves between 1000-3500 rpms in gears 1-2-3 in sport mode is to limit drone.
Re: not scientific, for fun only
'dynolicious' http://www.bunsentech.com/products/dyno ... /index.phphlbeckley wrote:Ok what iPhone app did u use pls? Am keen to give it a go too!
there is a lot of info out there and runs vs actual drag strip runs are almost identical
and when they are 'off', reads higher (slower, not faster) than actual
http://www.streetfire.net/video/iphone- ... 175854.htm
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe...Albert Einstein
Re: not scientific, for fun only
sakimano wrote:Myth. I have tested the car with valves open and closed and it's identical. Lots of third gear runs from 2k-8k logged on vagcom etc.sonny wrote: ( I should know the answer) But I do remember reading that there was a power loss with valves open, due to lack of back pressure, is this something that has been proven wrong?
There are enough restrictions in the stock exhaust that the valve isn't going to be so much of a game changer.
Closing of the exhaust valves between 1000-3500 rpms in gears 1-2-3 in sport mode is to limit drone.
Glad thats been nipped in the bud.
Money can't buy you love, but it can buy you a well sorted racecar
Re: not scientific, for fun only
sport mode exh flaps MIGHT cost a few lb ft of mid-range torque and gain a few HP at the top end, MIGHT, but not measurable and nor would it have any impact on performance
it's primarily for noise control/manipulation, anything else is a minor consequence and not intentional
it's primarily for noise control/manipulation, anything else is a minor consequence and not intentional
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe...Albert Einstein
Re: not scientific, for fun only
Agreed - 5hp is less than most rolling roads published margin of error.
Re: not scientific, for fun only
a few more numbers
30-90 mph using gears
1st 6000 to 8000 rpm 30-40 mph
2nd 5000-8000 40-66 mph
3rd 5500-7500 66-90
basically 3 runs through the 5k-8k power band
R&T 7.6
R&T 7.3
C&D 7.4
sport auto 7.6 (extrapolated from kph)
R&T R8 7.4
Audi performance test spec ~7.5 (extrapolated kph)
average ~ 7.5
mine, average of 6 runs, consistent 0-30 and 0-90 times
9.21 - 2.23 ~ 7
run in 40-50F temps, high humid, 1100' ASL, half to full tank, valves cleaned 30k miles ago
for reference the mags
0-30 1.5, mine 2.2 or so, very bad launch, but once rolling meets or beats almost all tests
even if the measurement is off 0.5 sec (unlikely, the reviews state very accurate the or error is on the slow side not the fast) I'm still at 7.5 sec or around the average
the 1-2 change is so hard my owners manual launches from its cubby, lol
30-90 mph using gears
1st 6000 to 8000 rpm 30-40 mph
2nd 5000-8000 40-66 mph
3rd 5500-7500 66-90
basically 3 runs through the 5k-8k power band
R&T 7.6
R&T 7.3
C&D 7.4
sport auto 7.6 (extrapolated from kph)
R&T R8 7.4
Audi performance test spec ~7.5 (extrapolated kph)
average ~ 7.5
mine, average of 6 runs, consistent 0-30 and 0-90 times
9.21 - 2.23 ~ 7
run in 40-50F temps, high humid, 1100' ASL, half to full tank, valves cleaned 30k miles ago
for reference the mags
0-30 1.5, mine 2.2 or so, very bad launch, but once rolling meets or beats almost all tests
even if the measurement is off 0.5 sec (unlikely, the reviews state very accurate the or error is on the slow side not the fast) I'm still at 7.5 sec or around the average
the 1-2 change is so hard my owners manual launches from its cubby, lol
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe...Albert Einstein
Re: not scientific, for fun only
I have had that happen at the dragstrip (owners manual). It's a bit hairy lol.
Get a couple of service receipts in there to thicken it up and it should be fine and stuck.
Get a couple of service receipts in there to thicken it up and it should be fine and stuck.
Re: not scientific, for fun only
Yes - I found the ipad fits in there perfectly... right up until something similar happens and it's not good!ArthurPE wrote:the 1-2 change is so hard my owners manual launches from its cubby, lol
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2091 guests