Page 1 of 3

Re-Mapping and gearbox probs

Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 9:20 pm
by Paulm
Hi,

Thinking of ditching the BM and buying an RS6 Avant.

My question is how reliable is the gearbox on these cars. I have been searching through the site and see quite a few failing even on standard cars

How many on here have remapped their RS? Have you had any box probs and do you know how much torque your are running.

cheers

Paul

RE: Re-Mapping and gearbox probs

Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 9:33 pm
by quattrokid1
ditch the BM anyway... thats a good start:)

RE: Re-Mapping and gearbox probs

Posted: Sat May 26, 2007 12:52 pm
by Gavc500
Swap the BM for a 535d, remap it and the RS6 will still be more fun and quicker.

Need any other convincing?

Running std 450BHP and no gearbox prob's.

RE: Re-Mapping and gearbox probs

Posted: Sat May 26, 2007 3:17 pm
by Wolverine
Running 536BHP and 600 lb of torque .... no problems and gearbox still smooth as silk.

Posted: Sat May 26, 2007 7:37 pm
by Paulm
Yeah that is the 2 cars I am looking at 535d or RS6 just not sure which way to go :?

Posted: Sat May 26, 2007 8:01 pm
by GardinerG
Why would you be comparing a 535Diesel to an RS6?? If you ignore the smell and the noise of the diesel you are still left with a choice between a (semi) common car and an exclusive car IMHO. Performance wise, you just can't compare them, both can be tuned, the RS6 to easily 500Bhp+ (not forgetting the fact that the higher BHP is because of the higher rev limit).

I dislike the current BMW styling, but many like it. Oh and then there's the 4WD...and trying to put that much power down on winter roads with RWD. Many of my friends run BMW diesels and they all sound like tanks, even though I totally respect they can do 2 to 3 times the MPG the RS6 does. As I said, this is just my humble opinion.

Which are you after, MPG or GPM?? (Grins Per Mile) :lol:

Have you driven a '6 yet, if not you should!

Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 12:50 am
by el_ringo
I toyed with the idea if a 535d; definitely go for the '6! Smiles per gallon all the way!

R

Re: RE: Re-Mapping and gearbox probs

Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 4:36 pm
by Paulm
Wolverine wrote:Running 536BHP and 600 lb of torque .... no problems and gearbox still smooth as silk.
600lbs how did you get that much. A chipped RS has only around 480ish

What boost are you running?

I am not knocking it just sounds awesome if I can get 600 lbs of torque

RE: Re: RE: Re-Mapping and gearbox probs

Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 6:22 pm
by RSVI
The RS6's when remapped normaly have 75-100 more torque than bhp.
(Someone corect me if I'm wrong.......again :oops: )

Re: RE: Re-Mapping and gearbox probs

Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 6:51 pm
by bigh
Paulm wrote:
Wolverine wrote:Running 536BHP and 600 lb of torque .... no problems and gearbox still smooth as silk.
600lbs how did you get that much. A chipped RS has only around 480ish

What boost are you running?

I am not knocking it just sounds awesome if I can get 600 lbs of torque
FYI a standard RS runs 560Nm

RE: Re: RE: Re-Mapping and gearbox probs

Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 7:07 pm
by GardinerG
Stock is 560 Nm and 415lbs/ft (not RS6+), you're confusing the two. :)
.
FYI AMD do tuning packages that range from:
+55Bhp and 50lbs/ft.
to
+150Bhp and 105lbs/ft depending on the size of your wallet.

And 520lbs/ft would equal 705Nm if my calculations are correct... ouch. Don't know if that helps.

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re-Mapping and gearbox probs

Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 7:52 pm
by bigh
GardinerG wrote:Stock is 560 Nm and 415lbs/ft (not RS6+), you're confusing the two. :)
opps, sorry :oops:

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re-Mapping and gearbox probs

Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 11:58 am
by BigMo
paulm - you off the Evotechnik forum?

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re-Mapping and gearbox probs

Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 12:04 pm
by Paulm
BigMo wrote:paulm - you off the Evotechnik forum?
No sorry not me. What is it?

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re-Mapping and gearbox probs

Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 2:54 pm
by skiwi
if surprised at the breadth of your quest. you are comparing radically different cars. the rs though is the best compromise between speed, handling, practicality and residuals of which i am aware....