Please doTTE Si wrote:We make near 1000nm on our RS6 no issues. If want I can put you In touch with the company that modified ours.

Please doTTE Si wrote:We make near 1000nm on our RS6 no issues. If want I can put you In touch with the company that modified ours.
Because I couldn't for the life of me spell it or find last night...Shoppinit wrote:Why not just name them?
TTE Si wrote:Because I couldn't for the life of me spell it or find last night...Shoppinit wrote:Why not just name them?
But here : https://www.facebook.com/Getriebeklinik ... 819853656/
I could be wrong but I think they're referring to the two RS's in the photo combined.....?Steveo wrote:
Getriebeklinik added 2 new photos.
8 March at 07:43 ·
Audi RS6+ C5 4B
1198 PS & 1578 NM
I clicked on the link and saw the numbers for the C5. 1198ps
So they are admitting something isn't quite right, but not doing anything about it?blm70 wrote:I did and he acknowledged the fact that these boxes can handle up to 850+Nm etc. Chap then pointed out that the torque converters they use are reconditioned units they buy in i.e. this would be the weak link so to speak, and that whilst these TC's are fine with non-modified cars, once you start mapping then it becomes a lottery as to whether it will hold or not.
He showed me the inside of one where there is only one friction band in place to handle the torque. Later model 'boxes have more bands and he pointed to the Mercedes boxes that are apparently much more robust because of this.
Does this sound like b/s or does he have a point?
I understand MRC's approach removes any doubt by simply replacing the 'box with an exchange unit direct from Audi, although it's not a cheap option which is why many people consider getting theirs rebuilt (not cheap either.)
I have considered the updated components route, although I'm wary of it still not fixing the issue, as Murphy's Law would no doubt apply. At least the exchange unit option comes with a 2 year warranty.
Just doing the math - going from standard torque of 413lb/ft to (potentially) 650lb/ft is almost a 40% increase. Whilst mechanical components do have headroom, this sounds like a big ask...
Anyway, it's running fine at present and MRC have recently carried out a flush and ATF change, so for now I'll just enjoy it but I do see an exchange 'box on the horizon some time this year...
Never really looks that impressive, it's just a picture of two cars.nickb834 wrote:I could be wrong but I think they're referring to the two RS's in the photo combined.....?Steveo wrote:
Getriebeklinik added 2 new photos.
8 March at 07:43 ·
Audi RS6+ C5 4B
1198 PS & 1578 NM
I clicked on the link and saw the numbers for the C5. 1198ps
Oh I dunno about that - I like the one with the fat bum on the left.....bam_bam wrote: Never really looks that impressive, it's just a picture of two cars.
1383PS 1717Nm.
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 125 guests