interesting facts:
Audi Rs6 Mercedes C32 T AMG
0-60 4.8 sec. [img]images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] 5.2 sec.
0-100 10.8 [img]images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] 11.3
0-125 17.8 [img]images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] 17.4
bhp 450 354
weight in kg 1955 1695
consume(sorry, in litres per 100km)
14.6 (super plus) [img]images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] 11.9 (super)
price(in €) 89600 [img]images/graemlins/033102bad_1_prv.gif[/img] 58928
A bit bizarr, the fact that the rs6 is faster to 100 mph, but not to 125. And that the rs6 is consuming much more petrol. [img]images/graemlins/24430-audibash.gif[/img] And look at the price. [img]images/graemlins/033102bad_1_prv.gif[/img]
Audi RS 6 Avant vs. Mercedes C 32 T AMG
Audi RS 6 Avant vs. Mercedes C 32 T AMG
ADAC VOLKSWAGEN POLO CUP 2005
www.constantin-dressler.de
www.constantin-dressler.de
Re: Audi RS 6 Avant vs. Mercedes C 32 T AMG
MB has a more expensive wind tunnel [img]images/graemlins/roflmao.gif[/img] and less loss in transmissions.
The C32 is a great car, but should be compared more with S4 / RS 4.
The C32 is a great car, but should be compared more with S4 / RS 4.
-
- 2nd Gear
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2003 12:24 am
- Location: Rome, Italy
- Contact:
Re: Audi RS 6 Avant vs. Mercedes C 32 T AMG
Agree. The E55 is the car that should be compared to the RS6
Re: Audi RS 6 Avant vs. Mercedes C 32 T AMG
Yes, but where is Mercedes' enemie on sector of th sl 55 amg?
ADAC VOLKSWAGEN POLO CUP 2005
www.constantin-dressler.de
www.constantin-dressler.de
- runrowsam
- 2nd Gear
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2003 11:39 pm
- Location: Bath (University), Surrey (home)
- Contact:
Re: Audi RS 6 Avant vs. Mercedes C 32 T AMG
I think all they have to worry about are cars like the RUF Turbo R, Ferrari 360 perhaps as the 550/575 are a lot more expensive. It's true though, the SL55 is some beast, and it really is hard to find something to compete with it.
Rock on
Sam [img]images/graemlins/thumbs.gif[/img]
Rock on
Sam [img]images/graemlins/thumbs.gif[/img]
If you can drive it, I can crash it
Re: Audi RS 6 Avant vs. Mercedes C 32 T AMG
yes i agree, its one nice motorcar....... but it lacks the german horse...... (porsche) history, quality and engineering...... merc`s are for old men who just buy them to prove a point...... the only reason they made the e55 with abit more bhp than the RS6 was the snatch the glory for the fastest production car etc etc..... so when porsche announced that the Carrera GT was having 612bhp merc go and build a CL65 AMG with 620bhp and 1000nm [img]images/graemlins/jawdrop.gif[/img] like i said they make cars just to prove points these days...... their lastest project is a V6 compressor a-class A32K......... they plan only to build 10 and the work is undertaken by the motorsport devision who made the CLK-GTR..... guess how much they want for this A32K a-class amg £250,000 feck! [img]images/graemlins/jawdrop.gif[/img] madness [img]images/graemlins/062802beat_prv.gif[/img]It's true though, the SL55 is some beast


Re: Audi RS 6 Avant vs. Mercedes C 32 T AMG
I suggest meeting the said AMG on the road.... I'm sure you'll destroy it on the road. I've met most of the AMG's on the open roads here in Japan and there's no competition. They back off pretty quick. AMG are notorious for 'extra' tuning their road cars for magazine tests too.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests